SBIR/STTR Research Award

Efficient Chemical Storage of Hydrogen in a Liquid

Award identifier ec42f294dd1729109e71c9cdbd860dcba60499081adc2e6f4d9b1a01d3e1499aAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$747,290

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
POWDERMET INC
Proposal award date
2011-09-16
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
TK9JT3DMDW14
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-244

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This Proposal is on development of chemistry of mixtures of methylphenanthrenes (I) as a media for hydrogen storage. Previous research, performed in Phase I, have established the routes by which such mixtures can be generated. Their hydrogenation over Ru catalyst has been shown to result in perhydro derivatives (II). An analysis based on measured properties of those hydrogenated mixtures demonstrated that they satisfied the DOE 2010 requirements for the hydrogen storage material due to their high hydrogen content and other properties such as low melting points, high boiling points, non-flammability, and low toxicity. The purely chemical part of the Phase II will concentrate on such aspects as 1) Search for an inexpensive source of I; 2) Study on transformation of the alkanes II back into I with concominant hydrogen evolution; 3) Study of an aerial oxidation of the I into methylphenanthrenequinones III and utilization of the released heat to drive the dehydrogenation process II & #8594;I; 4) Hydrogenation of III into II that will recycle the hydrogen storage media. An engineering part will concentrate on building up a series of prototype devices of increasing complexity that will evolve hydrogen from II. The simplest reactors will use an outside source of heat (like heating mantle) to drive the endothermic dehydrogenation process; more advanced devices will utilize the heat from the oxidation process I & #8594;III to drive the dehydrogenation reaction. An ideal reactor will combine dehydrogenation and oxidation steps performed in different compartments for the continuous generation of hydrogen. BENEFIT: If sucesfull this hydrogen storage technology could revolutionize the battlefield as well as civilian infrastructure transitioning to a hydrogen economy. This Phase II program will demonstrate a viable liquid chemical storage of hydrogen that can use existing liquid fuel infrastructure to achieve greater than 5% hydrogen by weight system capability for existing and future hydrogen fuel cell applications. Ideally this technology could eliminate petroleum based combustion fuels from use in the field.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

123 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2024). Reported award amounts total $29,889,391. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.