SBIR/STTR Research Award

Superhydrophobic Aerogel as Sorbent Material for CO2 Capture

Award identifier fdaf4095fe5f736cdda0beae38731a60c081624883c72c5a33c1dc2fadd9a7e7Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,973

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ASPEN AEROGELS, INC.
Proposal award date
2011-08-15
Contract end date
2013-08-14
UEI
RUMAJ7ELJG96
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000508
Topic code
24 b

Research abstract

Coal fired power plants are a leading producer of carbon dioxide emissions. To reduce the potential of global warming, carbon dioxide can be captured at the exhaust of coal fired power plants for capture and sequestration. The technology to capture carbon dioxide at the emissions source must be able to be implemented both economically and on a very large scale. Currently, the leading technology to capture carbon dioxide at coal fired power plants is through the temperature swing adsorption process by using aqueous amines. Carbon dioxide adsorbs readily onto amines, and is desorbed for capture upon heating. The heat capacity of the current aqueous based solutions is too high because the solutions are 70% water. The energy to heat and cool the water as the solvent is circulating is energy intensive, and imparts a high cost on the production of electricity. Solid sorbents have been identified as a material solution to improve the economics of CO2 capture by lowering the energy regeneration of the capture material. In Phase I, Aspen Aerogels developed a novel solid sorbent technology that has a much lower equivalent heat capacity than aqueous amines. The long-term cycle life of the new sorbent is also highly promising. Having a lower recirculating heat capacity and thus a lower energy for regeneration, this sorbent improves the economics of the carbon dioxide temperature swing process. In Phase II, Aspen Aerogels will improve the total working capacity of the sorbent and characterize its performance in exposure to sulfur and nitrogen gases over long cyclic testing to verify robustness and longevity to coal based combustion products. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Success of manufacturing high efficiency novel sorbent based superhydrophobic aerogel material for CO2 will be of great benefit to retrofit the existing fleet of coal-fired power plants for carbon capture and sequestration and meet challenges of CO2 legislation targets. These aerogels will also find different applications in private and commercial sectors (catalyst, natural gas purification, refinery boilers, energy storage).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

91 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2013). Reported award amounts total $27,895,998. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.