SBIR/STTR Research Award

Non-Destructive Technique for Measurement of Electron Bunch Longitudinal Charge Distribution

Award identifier c23eadaf0fce5c5a4568cc77b8b493409f8a6f11e98d76dee3609a907612da54Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$147,376

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Advanced Energy Systems, Inc
Proposal award date
2011-06-17
Contract end date
2012-05-16
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000413
Topic code
12 b

Research abstract

Measurement of the longitudinal charge distribution of short electron bunches moving with relativistic velocities is among the major challenges in the domain of accelerator diagnostics. The strict control of the longitudinal distribution is critical for the operation of X-ray Free Electron Lasers (FELs) and Energy Recovery Linacs (ERLs). Several techniques are presently employed; however, none of them can offer simultaneously high resolution and low cost while at the same time preserving the quality of the measured bunch. One high resolution technique uses a deflecting cavity to spread the bunch in a perpendicular direction. However, it is very expensive and completely destroys the bunch in the process of measurement. Other techniques rely on remotely sensing the electro-magnetic field of the bunch. These are non-destructive, but are limited in sensitivity and resolution, and need to be placed close to the bunch creating risk of bunch interception and radiation damage to components. Our novel solution is non-destructive, has good resolution and is affordable. AES proposes a novel approach that builds upon one of the existing non-destructive techniques. With the help of a low energy electron beam, we will probe the relativistic bunch electro-magnetic field. Afterward we will use a deflecting cavity to analyze the effect on the probe beam due to the relativistic bunch electro-magnetic field. Since the probe beam will have very low energy compared to the relativistic bunch, the requirements for the deflecting cavity will be much lower resulting in a smaller measurement system with a lower cost. AES will demonstrate that the proposed non-destructive technique for measurement of the longitudinal charge distribution of short bunches is capable of achieving the desired resolution and sensitivity while keeping the costs low. A comprehensive simulation framework will be established to demonstrate the performance and set the requirements for the system, and the conceptual design of the measurement device will be completed. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The development of non-destructive technique for longitudinal charge distribution measurements is important for existing and future accelerators such as FELs, ERLs and 3-rd generation light sources. The possibility of applying instantaneous feedback will improve the beam quality delivered by these machines, increase their efficiency and reduce operational costs. In addition, the absence of material components on the path of the relativistic bunch will eliminate component activation and reduce the amount of radiation produced by bremsstrahlung

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.