SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reduce Nb3Sn Strand Deformation when Fabricating High Jc Rutherford Cables

Award identifier 31cef2f44207a4ef3196e43eb2573e2e2fbacf5eb381d2fa46603f73873d71a6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
HYPER TECH RESEARCH INC
Proposal award date
2011-06-17
Contract end date
2012-05-16
UEI
YPG9JKMCSUA8
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000413
Topic code
64 a

Research abstract

This proposal is submitted in response to the SBIR/STTR High Energy Physics Solicitation Topic 64(a). High-Field Superconductor and Superconducting Magnet Technologies for High Energy Particle Colliders, (a) High-Field Superconducting Wire Technologies for Magnets. The need is for strands that can operate in the 15/17T or higher regime, and have deff values of 40 m or less, with non-Cu Jc values at 3000 A/mm2 (12T-4.2K) or greater and 1500 A/mm2 (15T-4.2K) or greater, and have stable operation throughout their operational fields. Strands close to these values are starting to be obtained, but the instability in the low field and defects due to cabling are issues to be solved. Hyper Tech has a desire to improve the wire design for better cabling while optimizing subelement shape to increase non-copper Jc at high field at 4.2K for high count restack wire. We would like to see the achievement of non-Cu Jcs of about 3000 A/mm2 at 12T-4.2K for the Tube type strands with filament size of 30~35 m for Rutherford cabled used in HEP applications. The goal of this research is to improve wire design for better cabling while optimizing the subelement shape to increase non-copper Jc at 12T-4.2K to above 3000 A/mm2 for tube type strands with filament size of 30~35 m. In order to do so, we plan to increase Cu between subelements and the Cu in the middle of restack wire to improve the wire Rutherford cabling without subelement breakage and merging, and make round subelements to maximize the reaction of available Nb so as to increase the non-Cu Jc. The goal of this Phase I and Phase II program is to develop a conductor with target Jc values of 3000 A/mm2 at 12T-4.2K, 1500-1800 A/mm2 at 15T-4.2 K with a subelement count of more than 200, and d deff values of 35 m or less, and better cabling without subelement breakage and merging. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The success of this SBIR will lead to a fully stable strand with high Is and Js for DOE-HEP that will have a demonstrated non-Cu Jc of about 3000A/mm2 (12 T-4.2K) and 1500-1800 A/mm2 (15T-4.2K) while demonstrating that the strand can be fabricated into a Rutherford cable without subelement breakage and merging

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

102 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2025). Reported award amounts total $40,663,857. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.