SBIR/STTR Research Award

Physics-based Life Prediction Model Incorporating Environmental Effects for SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites

Award identifier 7053ee5150a494450ec081774c75a25114fb8deddec93a25ff5e6f0a86c4a03bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Multiscale Design Systems, LLC
Proposal award date
2011-05-31
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
GJEZYNLKCZS7
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-125

Research abstract

MDS, LLC in collaboration with Rolls-Royce, Hyper-Therm HTC, AFIT, University of Akron and Columbia University will develop a validated physics-based long-term deformation and life prediction multiscale-multiphysics design system (M2DS) for advanced ceramic matrix composites under aerospace gas turbine engine environmental conditions. Specifically we will develop deterministic and probabilistic coupled thermo-mechano-oxidation models of degradation, mechanistic thermal fatigue model and CMC optimization toolkit that will enable to find the best approaches for protecting against oxidation depending on the application conditions, such as environment, temperature, stresses and required component lives. M2DS will be validated for two material systems, Chemical Vapor Infiltrated CMC and Melt Infiltrated CMC GEN II, by utilizing AFIT/AFRL burner rig to simulate various combustion and mechanical loading conditions. BENEFIT: Currently, there are at least two CMC components planned for eventual introduction into the F136 engine. This process would be accelerated if there were validated structural assurance tools available to the design community. It would also have a huge cost benefit, not only from the improved performance, but also from the reduced development costs. The current approach to structural assurance is to build an extensive data base covering all potential failure modes, very expensive and time consuming, followed by building components and destructively testing them, costing additional resources. Validated life assurance models would remove much of this cost. It would provide the confidence necessary to accelerate the use of CMC components and to gain the experience that would promote their usage. In addition to the application to military craft, there are a significant number of static CMC components planned for civil application, such as advanced friction systems, in the relatively near future. The development of efficient computational tools for sensitivity analysis, error and uncertainty quantification, and the solution of model calibration inverse problems are critically important to design and decision under uncertainty and is therefore a fundamentally important goal across DOD Agencies and civil applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2013). Reported award amounts total $2,870,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.