SBIR/STTR Research Award

Power System Robustness Assessment Tool for All-Electric Aircraft

Award identifier a06724cdeeaa9c29ca4bf0290b7d2ad8168d014236628bc135a8c7d2c6adde12Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,968

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
RIDGETOP GROUP INC
Proposal award date
2011-02-15
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CRLUWHJZHLU8
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-203

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: An innovative electrical power system (EPS) Robustness design tool will be created for calculating system-level Robustness in aircraft. The design employs flowgraph models for components at different levels of hierarchy including power sources, electronic circuit breakers, and electromechanical actuator (EMA) loads, which can be connected together. The components accept real measured data, including degradation effects, to produce a system-level Robustness RB(t) metric. The models can be connected in in series, parallel, and combinations of both to conduct extensive"what-if"analyses to optimize the design for overall system reliability improvements. The model parameters are drawn from consensus inputs, then adjusted with composite degradation factor (DF) information obtained from prognostic and diagnostic data on fielded units. Using Bayesian Network methods, this information is used to calibrate the model through a series of updates drawn from actual degradation data, field database information, or HALT testing results. Each model in the EPS contributes to the overall system Robustness and this is handled using an extension of Bayesian Network analysis. The result of this SBIR Program will be a much more accurate and modern alternative to determining system reliability in the presence of LRU degradation from actual environmental effects (heat, radiation, vibration) and wear patterns. BENEFIT: The metric of Robustness goes far beyond standards-based MTBF reliability prediction tools and offers far more relevant information on the performance of the system to perform its intended tasks. This information is useful in the improvement in reliability of all-electric aircraft designs, and supporting life cycle cost reductions by identifying best candidates for design improvements that improve robustness. With this SBIR program, Ridgetop will leverage its prior innovations in signature-based prognostics to address the realistic assessment of robustness of aircraft power systems. The result will be a deterministic analysis tool that allows the importing of field data from airborne power systems to provide well-calibrated models that can be employed in"what if"analyses to improve reliable performance of these complex systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

80 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2025). Reported award amounts total $27,524,868. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.