SBIR/STTR Research Award

Peel-and-Stick Nutplates

Award identifier 92be0cfb6c2076a145902e58cd3d1160df1932e3c5d8a02c73ffb4db39e24229Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TEXAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE , AUSTIN, INC.
Proposal award date
2010-12-22
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LM1NWMDNNQ18
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-147

Research abstract

In the current aircraft manufacturing environment there is an ongoing need to increase production rates and efficiencies. One of the innovations that has decreased fabrication times is bonded nutplates. Adhesively bonded nutplates can be installed in a fraction of the time required for the installation of riveted nutplates. Labor savings of 50-80% are possible by replacing riveted nutplates with bonded nutplates. While these savings are significant, opportunities exist for additional labor and cost reductions. During Phase I TRI/Austin will develop a one-component peel-and-stick nutplate adhesive that will eliminate the need for surface preparation or application of adhesive to the nutplates. This technology will be based on an acrylic based adhesive that will provide increased assembly speed and lower assembly costs. Recent advances in anaerobically cured adhesives make it now possible to formulate adhesives that will cure rapidly on low energy surfaces including stainless steel and polymer matrix composites. The overall objective of the Phase I effort will be development of adhesive systems that are tailored specifically for peel and stick nutplate installation. This will result in a process that is more efficient while producing bonds that are reliable in terms of adhesion performance. Processes will be developed to pre-apply the adhesive to nutplates before the bagging procedure. Activation of the adhesive will occur when the adhesive is mated to the substrate during installation. BENEFIT: The need for improved efficiencies in aircraft manufacturing is ever present. Aircraft specifications require tight tolerances in the manufacturing process, and the proposed technology will eliminate the manual application of adhesive. Automation is particularly important in F-35 assembly, where the production rate is projected to reach one per day. Bonded nutplates are used in other manufacturing areas including commercial airliners, helicopters, launch vehicles, satellites, yachts, buses, trucks, racecars, and sporting goods. These areas will benefit from the improved bonding rates as well.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

416 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $140,672,616. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, Department of Commerce, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.