SBIR/STTR Research Award

Robust Aircraft Electrical Power System Architectures

Award identifier 99c49674428859663e9130ee38c2282e7ec3496bf3b7ef1c55c1f31cf83ad0a6Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$149,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
PC KRAUSE & ASSOCIATES INC
Proposal award date
2010-12-15
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SJR4NTU7XBE4
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
N103-212

Research abstract

The move to more-electric architectures during the past decade in military and commercial airborne systems continues to increase the complexity of designing and specifying the electric power system (EPS). The addition of numerous high-power electric loads has drastically altered the dynamics of power flow on the electrical bus. Many of these loads often exhibit peak-to-average power ratios in excess of 5-to-1 for brief periods of time (50-5000 ms). In addition to this high peak-power, some of the loads can produce regenerative power flow equal to their peak power draw for brief periods of time (typically 20-200 ms). In addition to the ever increasing dynamics of electrical loads in the modern fighter, the move to electrify more systems has increased the criticality of the EPS leading to increased need for redundant and configurable systems. In the modern fighter, the resulting reliability requirements have led to EPS architectures wherein multiple sources exist within the aircraft that are dynamically taken in or out of the EPS based upon the failure status of a variety of components. Such reconfiguration is practical in large part due to the aircraft capability to adjust power requirements in response to source limitations by adjusting the performance capabilities of the platform. As the reconfigurability of the EPS, the number of available sources, and the number, complexity, and criticality of system loads continue to increase, several interesting questions arise regarding the design and validation of the EPS including: 1) Will the proposed EPS architecture be stable under all possible configurations of system loads? 2) Does the architecture optimally utilize the variety of source capabilities that exist throughout the aircraft? In this proposal, PCKA outlines a strategy to address these questions by investigating the potential to extend the source control coordination recently developed in relation to electrical accumulator technology to address source utilization and the stability by design concepts outlined in recent controls literature to develop a robust electrical power system (REPS) (potentially including multiple sources and loads) that ensures large-displacement stability of a modern more-electric aircraft (MEA) EPS against any load type. A combination of theoretical development, architectural proposal and analysis, and numerical MS & A shall be utilized to define the framework for stability analysis, define a multi-source architecture, develop a coordinated source control approach, and demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed advancements. Specifically, the tasks outlined in the proposal will be performed at a fidelity required to predict system stability of a representative MEA REPS architecture with sufficient confidence that a Phase II award to investigate system performance in hardware would be justified.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

108 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2025). Reported award amounts total $57,862,355. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.