SBIR/STTR Research Award

Gear Hobbing Predictive Model

Award identifier 251d7e548a6c5b46304bed85c7ee1b813dfb872e0ecfa1891bfd2ee5c85f971fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$79,971

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
SCIENTIFIC FORMING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2010-08-22
Contract end date
2011-02-22
UEI
C3KQLXA83X57
Solicitation number
2010.2
Topic code
N102-122

Research abstract

Hobbing is one of the most efficient and often used machining process to manufacture helical and spur gears. Hobbing process is a widely preferred to make gears as it can achieve near net shape with excellent tolerances and good surface finish at faster production rates. Gear hobbing is a complex machining process which requires a detailed understanding of the interaction of processing variables, the hobbing tool design and the material removal mechanisms. A clear understanding of the cutting forces and the temperature at the interface of the hobbing tool and gear blank workpiece interface is essential to predict the cutting induced residual stresses. The hobbing tool geometry along with the axial feed rate and the rotation speed of the tool dictates the chip shape. Because of the nature of the gear hobbing process which involves progressive cuts and varying material removal rates at the entry and exit of the cutting zone, the hobbing tool typically experiences non-uniform tool wear. Hobbing tools are expensive and excessive tool wear impacts increased tool interface temperature, chip shape and the gear surface finish quality. Industry needs a finite element method process modeling system to simulate the gear hobbing process to predict the chip shape, cutting load, temperature at the interface, tool wear and the cutting induced residual stresses. Commercially available, finite element method based process modeling system, DEFORM is widely used to model machining processes as well as material deformation and heat treatment processes. At the end of phase I base part of this project, we propose to demonstrate a proof of concept predictive models for analyzing forces, temperatures and residual stresses encountered during a typical gear hobbing process. In addition, it is also proposed that we will complete a typical heat treatment process model for a gear to demonstrate the capability with in DEFORM to model diffusion based carburization process to predict case depth, phase transformation during the quenching process to predict marternsitic volume fraction and any retained austenite in the gear as well as the residual stress distribution in the gear due to the heat treatment process. At the end of phase I option part of this project, we propose to investigate tool wear models, study the suitability of application of inverse methods to calculate material flow stress data at the high strain rates and evaluate options to improve computational efficiency of the machining processes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2019). Reported award amounts total $7,381,883. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.