SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Meta-modeling Approach to Failure Prognosis Using Existing Data

Award identifier e0ba25d0daec866a48da6dc5c5a8d1507b74bcd1dc494f9debf6343252b8ee64Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,723

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Impact Technologies
Proposal award date
2010-06-18
Contract end date
2011-02-28
UEI
T1JNUWJLN5M1
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-207

Research abstract

Impact Technologies, LLC, proposes to develop and demonstrate an A Meta-modeling Approach to Failure Prognosis Using Existing Data. The approach will serve as the basis for a prognostic system framework using cause-effect meta-model Response Surface Method (RSM) concepts to capture the relationship between the prognostic outcome (RUL or TTF), and its primary factors as manifested from existing processed data. Historically, implementation of CBM/PHM algorithms for fault diagnosis and prognosis require the availability of “ground truth” fault and fault progression data derived from seeded fault testing or on-platform data acquisition. Such data are not readily available for most complex systems and fault data acquisition methods require extensive resources to arrive at an appropriate dataset. Introduction of new techniques such as the one proposed, that utilize archived data in the absence of on-line fault/failure time series data, in combination with CBM/PHM technologies and classical reliability tools, are needed to accurately predict the remaining life of military and industrial assets. In doing so, these techniques will make possible more wide spread, cost effective implementation of on-line, real-time CBM/PHM systems; thereby, greatly reducing the cost and burden associated with maintenance, repair and overhaul practices for aircraft, ground facilities, and other vital equipment. BENEFIT: Implementation of CBM/PHM algorithms for fault diagnosis and prognosis require “ground truth” fault and fault progression data typically derived from seeded fault testing or on-platform data acquisition. Such data are not readily available for most complex systems and fault data acquisition methods require extensive resources to arrive at an appropriate dataset. The Meta-modeling Approach to Prognosis using Existing Data offers a crucial link to the implementation of CBM/PHM strategies where currently not possible due to the absence of ground truth. In this approach, existing data serves as the basis for a prognostic model, circumventing more typical lengthy development paths. In doing so, this enables quicker, more cost effective development of CBM/PHM technologies and contribution to the transformation away from traditional scheduled/corrective maintenance practices to predictive maintenance. This approach also serves as the basis for a comprehensive Life Management Framework that includes: data processing/mining, FMECA/RCM methods, data/feature fusion techniques, metamodel design/testing, decision support, performance metrics, and risk assessment/management. Given the potential benefits, this approach to usage based prognostics will be attractive to military and commercial applications, including, but not limited to ground and air vehicle maintenance/repair organizations, aircraft logistics support centers such as Warner Robins, manufacturing, and ship construction/repair facilities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

232 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2014). Reported award amounts total $76,299,884. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.