SBIR/STTR Research Award

Functional Graded Conductor Rails for Electromagnetic Launchers

Award identifier ef69d3885d2ae3e06ec12a7b16fc17f86b7e73934e06a6c395d8bd308bef7290Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Plasma Processes, LLC
Proposal award date
2010-05-10
Contract end date
2011-03-09
UEI
KAWTP8XNFEK9
Solicitation number
2010.1
Topic code
N101-086

Research abstract

The US Navy is pursuing the development of an electromagnetic rail gun (EMRG) for long range naval surface fire support. Such guns have been built and operated successfully on a test basis, however several obstacles prevent them from usage in the field. One specific obstacle is the development of suitable materials for the conductor rails. Copper and Cu alloys have been materials of choice for electrical and thermal conductivity considerations. However, abrasion, rail arcs, balloting loads and molten armature metals easily degrade bare Cu surfaces. As a result multiple firings are not possible without significant barrel repair. In order to maximize electrical/thermal conductivity, Cu alloys are likely inescapable. In order to minimize damage to Cu rail, a material with a high melting temperature and high density is essential. Therefore, a rail structure that most practically meets these requirements would have a Cu-based core and a refractory metal surface. However, issues associated with coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch have challenged the production of such a structure via conventional manufacturing techniques. During a Phase I investigation, the ability to form a functionally graded Cu/refractory metal conductor rail surface will be evaluated. The ability to form net-shape, non-planar geometries and the feasibility to grade the through thickness properties will also be investigated.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

142 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2022). Reported award amounts total $54,048,279. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.