SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rugged Metal Rubber™ Sensor Film for Force and Shear Measurement of Aircraft Tires

Award identifier 15f22c0fba01745358f7dadcd5b8cd8ee9ba485b8d4cf0a734cb9976bceb22caAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$98,230

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
NANOSONIC INC.
Proposal award date
2010-04-19
Contract end date
2010-12-19
UEI
ZK7ECNMN7MM5
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-210

Research abstract

The purpose of this Air Force SBIR program is to develop and demonstrate normal and shear force sensor films made of NanoSonic’s novel Metal Rubber™ sensors that will be used to provide continuous, dynamic measurements of the forces generated under aircraft tire treads. The use of Metal Rubber™ films provides a flexible sensor film which can be patterned with an array of sensors. Sensors can be configured as a normal force or shear force sensors. An array of small flexible sensors allows the measurement of normal/shear forces by monitoring electrical changes in individual sensors. Different material properties result in forces being conveyed to the sensor site in various levels, depending on the desired measurement. Controlling material properties allows the sensors to measure the various loading profiles across the film. Sensor layering/patterning provides the film with the ability to measure a wide variety of forces in the contact patch. Test data acquisition using standard devices record the sensor responses in the entire contact patch and will provide inputs needed for FEM and post-processing analysis. The result of a successful Metal Rubber™ sensor film will be a rugged test mat that responds to both normal and shear forces in aircraft tires. BENEFIT: NanoSonic’s plans to develop a novel embedded Metal Rubber™ sensor film systems for force measurements in aircraft tire contact patches. Similar, multifunctional nanocomposite materials are also being developed for other applications by NanoSonic building on our ever-growing Metal Rubber™ family of materials, in 1) electronics, 2) aerospace and defense, and 3) biomedical engineering areas. Metal Rubber™ materials also have commercial use in flexible electronics, as interconnects in prosthesis and robotic devices, and in a range of aerospace system applications. Anticipated product sales would come from several areas related to integrated sensors, interrogation electronics and data links for monitoring components/parameters that currently cannot be monitored accurately or with such unobtrusive methods.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

469 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2026). Reported award amounts total $155,330,549. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.