SBIR/STTR Research Award

FADEC Thermal Management

Award identifier 0bf56ba9e2ff98a56ebe54901377a34a04c07a9053577f7c0afdbad57589491cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,944

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
Proposal award date
2010-03-11
Contract end date
2010-12-20
UEI
Z8KVZV3DR7J4
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-175

Research abstract

The Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) controls engine operation. The FADEC case must be maintained below 63°C, while the environment can be as hot as 170°C. The current design uses fuel to cool the FADEC, however, this often limits the allowable ground or flight idle time before the fuel is too hot to cool the FADEC. This SBIR Phase I project will develop a thermal management system for the FADEC that includes four components: 1. Active cooling to reject the FADEC waste heat to higher temperature heat sinks, 2. Heat pipes and other devices to reduce the temperature gradients inside the FADEC box, 3. Insulation to reduce the heat in-leak from the environment into the box, and 4. Thermal storage, to store heat at times when it cannot be rejected. The use of heat pipes and insulation will increase the heat rejection temperature for the FADEC from the current 63°C (145°F) to 87°C (189°F). This can be further increased with active cooling. The benefits include an increase in the allowable fuel temperature, increasing idle time. The goal of the Phase II program will be to design, fabricate, and test a full scale thermal management system for cooling the FADEC. BENEFIT: The thermal management system has direct application to cooling the FADEC on current and future fighter aircraft platforms. Heat will be rejected to either a remote sink, or to the fuel at a significantly higher temperature than currently. Even without active cooling, a redesign of the FADEC box internal heat spreading and insulation increases the heat rejection temperature from the current 63°C (145°F) to 87°C (189°F). For some near-term applications, this might be sufficient. Future FADEC boxes will have higher power, likely requiring active cooling. ACT plans to work with Hamilton Sundstrand Aerospace during the Phase I, II, and III programs to rapidly transition this cooling system from a concept to a product. In addition to the FADEC, there are a number of additional electronics boxes with maximum allowable temperatures only a few degrees above the FADEC. The cooling system developed here can also be applied to these electronics boxes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

282 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2026). Reported award amounts total $118,415,811. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.