SBIR/STTR Research Award

Efficient and Quiet Propeller Design for Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (SUAS)

Award identifier e8c4b51c63eaf4aea78fdfb7f392ea516be0bf04694a6b4fe64c091d8d88843dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,580

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Kord Technologies, Inc.
Proposal award date
2010-03-10
Contract end date
2010-12-08
UEI
SNCKMPABPLM3
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-163

Research abstract

Propellers have received little R&D emphasis over the past 50 years especially for small propellers. There has been a rapid increase in the use of small unmanned aircraft systems (SUAS) for military and commercial uses. This sudden demand has created a technology gap for small propellers. Radio-controlled (RC) propellers with basic airfoil sections and design practices are not optimized for the flight regime and mission of SUAS. These offer mediocre performance and high acoustic signatures due to the higher revolutions per minute (RPM) levels associated with internal combustion engines (ICE) thus allowing enemy forces to easily detect the presence of SUASs. With the recent push towards electric motors and quieter ICE technologies, there is a need for quieter propeller designs for military and commercial operations. This proposal aims to facilitate the development of innovative propeller designs for SUAS with less than 50 hp. The proposed solution will exploit the use of advanced parametric modeling, noise prediction algorithms and evolutionary airfoil sections to yield quieter propeller designs. This methodical approach combined with real experience designing and testing propellers and SUAS flight vehicles will result in achievement of the program’s acoustic and performance goals and thus improved SUAS mission endurance and survivability. BENEFIT: Commercialization of efficient and quiet propeller design technologies include licensing to numerous existing and future SUAS contractors. There are a number of contractors developing high endurance, ISR-focused SUASs for AFSOC, USSOCOM, and the AFRL’s Tube-Launched Expendable UAS (TLEU) program that require stealthy operation and need quiet propellers. Also the Navy’s Small Tier II UAS and the Army’s next version of Shadow (RQ-7C) will benefit from efficient and quiet propeller technologies. Commercial organizations need quieter propeller technology to operate in National Airspace for law enforcement, Homeland Security, emergency services, search and rescue, and disaster relief missions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2019). Reported award amounts total $3,821,071. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Contractor profile

KORD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.