SBIR/STTR Research Award

Course of Action (COA) Analysis, Comparison and Selection for Effects Based Space Operations

Award identifier 9f088b2c98a7a7378221b0a40308df9188d96a715b1b230f35101dd40ccc0b2fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,457

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
DECISIVE ANALYTICS CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2010-03-03
Contract end date
2010-12-01
UEI
MFA3QKYKLL31
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-050

Research abstract

A critical capability associated with space C2 is the ability to develop and analyze alternative courses of action (COAs) based on SSA and other intelligence sources and clearly define the cost and benefit associated with each option. However, the current COAs are primarily static or template driven responses and are adequate for day-to-day operations, but are insufficient in dealing with new situations that are evolving rapidly. The goal of this SBIR topic, therefore, is to develop a software capability to enable operators to develop and analyze COAs and select best approach for creating/maintaining desired space effects supporting on-going or planned operations. In order to accomplish this goals, the Decisive Analytics Corporation proposes to develop a decision support tool based on the advanced ‘Integer Programming’ mathematical models. The proposed mathematical technique should provide a significant benefit for space C2, since it is well suited for near real-time handling of decision problems with the large number of threats and with many possible alternative threat responses. The proposed decision support tool will provide the following capabilities: 1) Optimization of Blue force responses, 2) Automated iterative mechanism for the use of threat response preferences, and 3) Ability to manage a space threat response database. BENEFIT: This research effort will provide 1) high level of fusion method based on the advanced ‘Integer Programming’ techniques for developing, analyzing, and selecting the best COAs, and 2) the conceptual design of the GUI software for space threat response decision support system. This proposed decision support system’s operational benefits are 1) real time aid for space control decision makers through provision of a set of alternative COAs, 2) obtain optimization outputs with different operators’ threat response preferences, and comprehensive insights, and 3) efficient storage and modification of database and different threat responses.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

142 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2019). Reported award amounts total $60,145,153. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

DECISIVE ANALYTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.