SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-Cost Deorbiting System

Award identifier 783c88d8b5c7a95f35735b7ec9f934aca88f79bb4bf2f0faa76ab1e8d15ea950Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$2,683,460

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
M.M.A. DESIGN LLC
Proposal award date
2010-02-19
Contract end date
2016-05-16
UEI
HJGNEC99TWV5
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-198

Research abstract

The proposed Phase II SBIR will design, analyze, produce and test a protoflight unit for a Low Cost De-orbiting System. The proposed de-orbit module is a high reliability, modular, aero-blanket system that de-orbits a 180 kg spacecraft from an 800 km orbit to meet DOD Instruction 3100.12 for a 25 year de-orbit time. The de-orbit system uses common space flight qualified mechanical elements and materials to control costs while maintaining high reliability. The system requires redundant heater circuits from the spacecraft to initiate deployment. There is no power requirement from the spacecraft other than the deploy signal. The system is housed in a modular housing for easy integration into a variety of AF missions with no changes. The design fits within the available envelope inside a Mark II Lightband mounted on an ESPA ring though the design is scalable. Blanket based designs have been proposed and flown using flat blankets and carpenter tapes or other devices to deploy the aero-blanket. Often these systems require an additional deployment to achieve spacecraft passive stability. The proposed concept resulting from this SBIR uses an innovative pyramidal blanket to achieve passive stability and improved stiffness while maintaining simplicity and lower costs over previous systems. BENEFIT: Due to the nature of the atmosphere and parameters that affect the atmospheric drag, the proposed system will reduce de-orbit times by a factor of 10 to 40 times faster than satellites undergoing natural orbit decay. As an example, a 180 kg satellite that would not meet the 25-year de-orbit requirement naturally in a 700 km orbit, will meet the 25 year de-orbit requirement with margin with the proposed system. As part of the scalable aspect of our solution, MMA Design proposes to develop an analysis suite to tailor the solution to an entire class of satellites and desired de-orbit times. At the conclusion of the Phase II effort MMA will have completed the qualification of an ESPA class de-orbit system and have a protoflight de-orbit module available for a flight test mission. Potential commercial applications for the de-orbit product line include Iridium NEXT and associated ESPA opportunities, next generation ORBCOMM and WORLDVIEW, Cicero, and a host of other smaller class spacecraft.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

20 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2023). Reported award amounts total $11,235,796. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.