SBIR/STTR Research Award

Failure Initiation Predictors for Reliability-Based Design of Hybrid Composite Materials

Award identifier 2822952181a42cf6ab007b3ee58220bb21fc3ab3a268f9d250db8031f09ab7efAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,452

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
COMET TECHNOLOGY CORP
Proposal award date
2010-01-11
Contract end date
2012-01-11
UEI
EM22VKMWMY37
Solicitation number
2008.A
Topic code
AF08-T025

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This proposal is concerned with the development of a novel failure initiation and progressive failure analysis modeling method for advanced composite structures, including the analysis of selected structural joints utilizing a statistically based micromechanics model embedded in a 3D non-linear finite element code. The method accounts for the interaction between out-of-plane failure and in-plane failure and also the material microstructure. The proposal utilizes a fundamental physics based approach that is devoid of empirical formulas that have dominated failure prediction tools in composites. The results to be obtained will provide the necessary guidance in selecting the most robust methodology to achieve the desired goal of combining initial design with reliability based tools to re-design and evaluate existing designs of composite structures. In the proposed approach, designated as a “progressive failure analysis tool”, computations will be simultaneously carried out in parallel at three length scales, as needed (the laminate level, the lamina level and at the level of a fiber/matrix unit cell representation of the lamina), with strong coupling between the three scales. BENEFIT: This effort is expected to result in industry standard reliability prediction and reliable structure design tools for safe life design of military air vehicles. Commercial application includes the application of this reliability prediction and reliable structure design tools for safe life design of land, sea and air commercial vehicles. Reliability based analysis will help to move to reliability based certification, which is a long term drive to improve certification process, and eliminate overlapping conservative design factors. Improved analysis tools like the present development can aid with subcomponent certification testing, as better analysis helps to understand the tests. Progressive damage analysis is needed for many detailed joint configurations, as well as damage tolerance assessments of new unitized composite bonded assemblies. Current bonded pi-joints require certification testing for each new size and shape; this analysis tool could allow great reduction in the certification testing through the use of a combination of analysis developed as part of the proposed project and testing to develop pi-joint allowables.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2013). Reported award amounts total $2,578,780. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.