SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Coherence Interferometric Scanning System

Award identifier f3684483721d498aa2fd6d980506e1f4314568e005261e353efc3f15a3328215Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,998

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
2009-12-22
Contract end date
2010-07-01
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093C-123

Research abstract

To address the Air Force need for a new technique to control the outer mold line (OML) size and shape of aircraft composite components for the automation of aircraft assembly, Physical Optics Corporation (POC) proposes to develop a new fast and precise Low Coherence Interferometric Scanning System (LCISS) utilizing low coherence interferometry. The innovation in the LCISS design will enable OML measurements with better than 0.001” accuracy and the operation speed required for a production line. The fully developed LCISS will use the measured OML size for automatic determination of the best mutual parts locations to achieve production specifications. It will calculate the best locations for holes needed for the components assembly and shim dimensions, and project the required hole locations and shim thicknesses to the corresponding areas on the aircraft components. Its user-friendly software will be compatible with other design, manufacturing, and quality control software components used in aircraft manufacturing. In Phase I, POC will show feasibility of the LCISS technology by demonstrating a prototype operation and estimating its accuracy and speed of measurements. In Phase II, POC plans to develop a full scale prototype and demonstrate its operation in a production environment, achieving MRL-7. BENEFIT: Besides the fabrication of military aircraft, the same process automation LCISS system will find application in the assembly of commercial aircraft, shipbuilding, the automotive industry, and other industries, where the automation of the assembly process allows reducing component manufacturing tolerances. This system will lower the manufacturing cost by simplifying the assembly process and decreasing labor costs. It also will improve product quality by providing a better fit of the product parts to the assembly.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.