SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: Sensor Platform for Novel Submerged Barriers

Award identifier 25f46aee9950a87c634cec37f9a6669186119fcba61b71a0e0ceb8183714fc8aAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$1,242,694

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
DESIGNER ECOSYSTEMS LLC
Proposal award date
2026-07-24
Contract end date
2028-07-31
UEI
JWXVV8FPMAX9
Solicitation number
NSF 24-580
Topic code
ET

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project is to advance engineered structures that act as submerged barriers. The project will also develop monitoring systems to measure performance in real-world conditions. This information will help improve future designs and support more reliable coastal protection strategies. By combining infrastructure with ecological restoration, this work offers a more durable and cost-effective alternative to existing methods. The primary technical innovation of this project is the development and full-scale validation of a modular, engineered system that integrates predictable hydrodynamic performance with ecological function, coupled with in situ sensing to directly compare modeled and observed outcomes in high-energy nearshore settings. The high-risk element lies in demonstrating that a repeatable, parameterized geometry can achieve reliable attenuation under real-world conditions while also generating high-quality data for model calibration in settings where measurements are currently sparse or unavailable. The scope of this project is to design, deploy, and evaluate full-scale modules that function as submerged barriers. The project aims to: (1) advance the understanding of wave transformation and energy dissipation across structured, similar geometries, and (2) establish a framework for integrating physical infrastructure with continuous ambient monitoring to improve predictive coastal models. The proposed methodology includes fabrication of full-scale modular units using precast manufacturing techniques. Hydrodynamic performance will be assessed using a network of embedded and adjacent sensors measuring wave height, current velocity, and related environmental parameters. Baseline data collected prior to installation will be compared with post-installation measurements to quantify changes in wave energy, flow patterns, and sediment dynamics. Ecological monitoring will be conducted using a combination of visual surveys and ambient DNA sampling. These data will be used to validate and refine numerical models, enabling improved design of future installations and contributing to a more data-driven approach. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2025–2026). Reported award amounts total $1,544,463. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.