SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-Performance Fuels

Award identifier 9ed7280ac0c25afbc44be818913ea40c3d0e6f4b2fb5bbd45fe0c6a53070856bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$800,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Orbital Technologies Corporation
Proposal award date
2009-09-30
Contract end date
2013-03-21
UEI
XESXD6N437K9
Solicitation number
2006.1
Topic code
AF06-194

Research abstract

ORBITEC proposes to continue the development of high-performance fuels to replace monomethyl hydrazine (MMH) and other storable fuels for in-space propulsion applications. Compounds from various chemical families were proposed in Phase I to address these needs. These families of compounds have greater heats of formation, lower volatility, and lower toxicity than MMH. Their reduced vapor pressure provides greater safety in handling and less inhalation hazards than MMH. MMH has very low exposure limits due to its toxicity, and is also a suspected carcinogen. This increases the potential hazards during manufacture, transportation, storage, and operation of propulsion systems containing MMH-based fuels. Therefore, a fuel formulation containing a high-energy density, less toxic, non-carcinogenic fuel with lower vapor pressure (reduced inhalation and handling hazards) can significantly reduce the complexity and cost of propulsion systems development and operations. Phase II work will include additional fuel candidate synthesis and laboratory characterization, rocket performance evaluation in a lab-scale thrust chamber, fuel candidate down-select, plans for scale-up synthesis, and conceptual propulsion system designs that use the new fuel. BENEFIT: The end product of this overall research and development program will apply to satellite propulsion and station-keeping, military, civil, and commercial launch systems, as well as potential aerial warfare and tactical surface weapons. Near-term military applications include high-performance storable satellite propulsion including potential monopropellant applications, and high-performance liquid propulsion for target drones, cruise missiles, and other tactical systems. Other applications for these propellants are foreseen that include the kill vehicles for such programs as Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), NMD, Navy Upper Tier Theater Missile Defense (TMD) System, and the MEADS Air Defense System. NASA may find use for this technology in the support of upper stages as well as for in-space propulsion where high-performance storable propellants will offer benefits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

216 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2014). Reported award amounts total $56,646,148. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.