SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Ultra-High Strength Intrinsically Corrosion Resistant Steels Using High Pressure Powder Compaction Technology

Award identifier 2e6c336f09cd487523d4794b2d49957b8997555aec0b6db947dd5b11ace43440Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$99,997

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Utron Kinetics LLC
Proposal award date
2009-07-16
Contract end date
2010-01-16
UEI
RFY6CS4CXNM8
Solicitation number
2009.1
Topic code
OSD09-C04

Research abstract

In response to OSD/NAVY’s need for landing gear component applications, We propose to develop advanced high strength steels using CDC compaction manufacturing. Common materials used are 4340 steel, 300M, and AerMet 100. AerMet 100 has superior material properties to 4340 and 300M. Landing gear components made from AerMet 100 has had success within the USN. However this is an expensive and limited supply material. The nominal material property values for AerMet 100 are 250-ksi 0.2 percent yield strength, 285-ksi ultimate strength, and 100 ksivin. An ultra high strength stainless steel with mechanical properties equivalent to AeroMet 100 and the corrosion resistance of a PH 13-8 (H1025) is desired. Representative desirable properties include: UTS (ksi) > 290 YS (ksi) > 245 KIC (ksiãin) > 100 KISCC (ksiãin) > 70. UTRON proposes an innovative manufacturing process technology called the high pressure Combustion Driven Powder Compaction (CDC) to manufacture near net shape quality, dense, fine grained and mechanically durable high density ferrous based components such as Carpenter’s Custom 465 stainless martensitic steels, Aermet 100, 17-4 PH and Other PH 13-8 Mo martensitic stainless steel as base materials and select optimized alloying additions such as (e.g., Al, Nb, Hf, Zr, Re) to further improve the mechanical and corrosion properties as well as select composite dispersoids such as carbides such as boron carbide, silicon carbide. Some of the unique process advantages of CDC technology include higher green and sintered part densities, ability to produce novel alloys with near net shape parts, single/multi-layered materials, minimal shrinkage attributes compared to conventional means and improved microstructures/properties. We propose to develop competitive high strength and corrosion resistant steel alloys using high pressure CDC and suitable post-process HIPing, sintering/heat treatment strategies with improvement in mechanical and stress corrosion properties. Microstructures, microchemistries and properties of the optimized alloys will be developed. In Phase II, we plan to further focus on the optimum alloys and develop near net shape complex manufactured components as well as scale-up of the press/tooling hardware.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2024). Reported award amounts total $2,916,049. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.