SBIR/STTR Research Award

Exact modeling of targets in littoral environments

Award identifier 09e28f75ce7c880c9f5430642f83479e4cae2ffcb059e6f7977721e75df0295aAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$69,945

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
HEAT, LIGHT, AND SOUND RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2009-06-29
Contract end date
2010-04-30
UEI
NXJFVSE6BJC4
Solicitation number
2009.A
Topic code
N09-T026

Research abstract

We propose to use the finite element technique to model propagation of acoustics waves in a realistic shallow water (10-100 m) environment in the presence of man-made or natural targets. Such modeling accuracy is paramount in detection and classification of underwater targets. Currently available models make simplifying assumptions in modeling both scattering and propagation. Targets are usually modeled as non-penetrable (rigid) or having simple shapes. In most cases, simple scattering models such as the Kirchhoff approximation is used to compute the scattered field. The existing propagation models are also unable to accurately model a realistic ocean environment. For instance, there is no propagation model that can accurately compute propagation in a range-dependent ocean overlying an elastic bottom. These models cannot provide the accuracy that is needed for use in detection and classification of underwater targets. To properly account for the full physics of the problem, propagation and scattering should be solved as a single boundary value problem. Our approach will consist of three stages: in stage 1, we will use the finite element technique in 2-D to propagate the acoustic field to the target, in stage 2, we will use the finite element technique in 3-D to compute the scattered field, and in stage 3, we will use the finite element technique in 2-D to propagate the scattered field to the receiver. For shorter ranges and/or lower frequencies it may be possible to solve the whole problem in 3-D as a single boundary value problem. In Phase 1 of this effort, we will demonstrate the capability of our proposed approach to model scattering from a simple elastic target in a shallow water environment overlying an elastic bottom. In this phase, we will solve this problem for a source to target separation of approximately 1000 wavelengths. In Phase 2, we will extend the capability of our approach to model the problem for a source to target separation of approximately 10,000 wavelengths, and for arbitrary man-made or natural targets. The novelty of our approach is the use of the finite element method in propagation modeling, which has only become possible with advances in computer speed along with progress in modern finite element techniques.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

20 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2023). Reported award amounts total $14,285,634. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.