SBIR/STTR Research Award

Passive Dry Bay Fire Extinguishing System

Award identifier c379784c50bf777594c2ee2f630ad10faf7e3391a8c1b726a000d310f7e031e1Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,995

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SKYWARD, LTD.
Proposal award date
2009-06-22
Contract end date
2010-03-22
UEI
TD2PKTACBJH5
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-250

Research abstract

The proposed Skyward passive dry bay fire extinguishing system is based upon years of experience in research and development and test and evaluation in the passive fire protection area.  The proposed system is completely passive, without power requirements or sensors/detectors.  It offers a lightweight solution, at low cost, and without maintenance requirements under normal aircraft operation.  This system also has an ability to respond to multiple fires in multiple locations, and even if one element of the system is damaged from a ballistic threat, the system can still respond overall.  It can also respond to fires resulting from either safety hazards or combat-related ballistic threat events.  Skywards system is modular in nature, so various elements of the design can be employed if aircraft requirements dictate or pulled from the overall system to lower weight and cost, if not required.  The less mature elements of the Skyward system will be optimized for weight and cost during this Phase I SBIR and testing will demonstrate effectiveness in time to ensure a fire, if ignited, will be extinguished prior to permanent aircraft damage occurring.  Provided design criteria will enable vulnerability reduction engineers to make strong fire protection trade-off arguments. BENEFITS: The goal of Skyward, Ltd. in this proposal is to develop an effective passive dry bay fire extinguishing system with low enough weight and cost penalties to make it a practical solution for both military and commercial aircraft.  The modular nature of the system allows for even lower weight and cost when requirements may be more limited in scope.  Conversely, it allows for protection from a variety of safety-related fires or ballistic threat-induced fires, if fully employed.  The proposed system positively addresses those arguments that currently prevent dry bay fire protection from being transitioned to legacy or new aircraft.  The simple means for integrating this system enables it to be an easy retrofit, which should further enhance its potential for transition.  The proposed system offers an equally effective argument for military ground vehicles, with some minor adjustments to better suit the environment of these vehicles.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2025). Reported award amounts total $8,664,044. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.