SBIR/STTR Research Award

Architecture Methodology Integration

Award identifier 82fbf9c74b5e3d9ffbb172b8114bb705e5a91381931871c63d3a622883e64df9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,795

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TRIDENT SYSTEMS LLC
Proposal award date
2009-03-31
Contract end date
2011-06-30
UEI
QWM1XWLUFQM8
Solicitation number
2007.3
Topic code
AF073-016

Research abstract

The objective of this effort is to develop LAMMS (Legacy Architecture Migration & Maintenance Sys-tem) which includes a methodology to convert a structured analysis architecture to an object oriented ar-chitecture and provide an environment that automates that methodology.  Tridents approach is based on its InterchangeSE commercial product, a framework for any enterprise wide systems engineering solution that enables the implementation of processes and the integration of data from various sources into an inte-grated data model for total life-cycle engineering and management of complex systems.  Based on the InterchangeSE approach, Trident will convert the structured analysis architecture into its common data model and then convert from the common data model into an object oriented model.  This is done by de-veloping rules for mapping information from an architecture into the common data model within Inter-changeSE and then developing the automated bidirectional routines that implement those rules.  By main-taining consistency between the tools (i.e. the original structured analysis tool and the resulting UML tool), a program can choose to convert the architecture over time and maintain a hybrid model within In-terchangeSE.  In addition, the LAMMS environment will provide an assessment of how well the integrated model complies with standards like DoDAF and UML. BENEFIT: Most existing Air Force information systems are developed using a structured analysis methodology for systems engineering, software design and development.  The result is that the Air Force spends 70% of its software lifecycle costs on maintenance.  The Air Force anticipates that it can save millions of dollars in maintenance costs each year by converting the structured-analysis code into object-oriented code.  Use of existing code converters to accomplish this task results in programs that do not take full advantage of the modular nature of object oriented code and does not achieve the desired cost reduction.  The methodology and supporting environment that converts the available information at the system engineering level and allows for the traceability within the architecture and down into new object oriented design from which true object oriented code may be developed will realize this cost reduction objective.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

183 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2023). Reported award amounts total $85,236,072. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.