SBIR/STTR Research Award

Measuring Simulator Fidelity

Award identifier c7cd8b053172ded0c9ec70d70f39c476701e87138a21709377fba50def68a5d3Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,973

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Infoscitex Corporation
Proposal award date
2009-03-27
Contract end date
2010-01-27
UEI
NJM7E3Y9QXJ5
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-023

Research abstract

Quantifying the fidelity of flight simulators and other motion environments is a difficult and confounding task.  The main confounding factor is that it is difficult to obtain an objective measure from human users, since their performance is subject to their individual reactions and current state of mind.  Robotic solutions would eliminate the human element but are severely limited in that how humans integrate the large amounts of inputs they are subjected to in flight is not fully understood.  Infoscitex proposes to leave the human in the equation but eliminate the subjectivity associated with cognition.  Our system will record the underlying response of the body to the dynamics of flight.  Then, our system can be used in a flight simulator, and the correlation between the results in real flight and in the simulator subject to the flight dynamics of the aircraft will provide a measure of the fidelity of the simulator in question.  The system can be applied to any flight or motion simulator, including ones with force feedback, a motion base, or vision alone. BENEFIT: The problem of validating the equivalence of flight simulators is one that has been noted by diverse personnel involved with flight simulation, including military and civilian flight instructors.  Indeed, we already have obtained Boeings written interest in our system for their commercial flight trainers.  While the initial application of our system is to validate the equivalence of flight simulators to flight, development of the system will provide a comprehensive sensor suite that can record the bodys reaction to a number of complex inputs.  Several non-flight markets are therefore available, including medical evaluation, rehabilitation, exercise and entertainment.   The initial application will benefit flight training, in that by being able to ascertain the fidelity of existing simulators, and using the tool to develop even higher fidelity simulators, total in-flight training time can be decreased, and ground-based training time can be used more effectively.  This will result in safer and far more economical training of pilots, both civilian and military.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

210 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2013). Reported award amounts total $64,528,765. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.