SBIR/STTR Research Award

Weapons Effects FRMs for Reinforced Concrete Walls & Floor/Ceiling Slabs

Award identifier b71449ab3376d7811008a6c6782a95ce996b11b9a6c752043fdacf59925f1f1dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.
Proposal award date
2009-03-18
Contract end date
2009-12-17
UEI
DRAGFFDYMT53
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-088

Research abstract

The Air Force Research Laboratory developed the MEVA software for weaponeering applications.  MEVA allows a weaponeer to quickly study alternative targeting scenarios to maximize the effectiveness of a mission while minimizing the risk to the warfighter and the potential for collateral damage.   MEVA needs to be upgraded to support targeting needs for structures with RC slabs and walls that fall outside the current specifications of its blast response modules.  The main areas of enhancement required are: Support for higher strength concrete materials Support for the full range of hardened and civil construction that is (or will be) supported by STMG Support for the expanded range of loading produced by new weapon systems available to the weaponeer such as the MOP Support for more complex representations of blast pressure waveforms resulting from internal propagation through complex structural geometries Addition of new response measures such as breach and fragment/debris data that increase MEVAs effectiveness to support mission planning. WAI proposes to demonstrate proof of concept methods to address each of these areas in Phase I and develop the new software tools and integrate them within the MEVA software in a follow-on Phase II effort. BENEFIT: WAI has successfully commercialized products produced by previous SBIR efforts including the PZFlex software for piezoelectric modeling applications which will generate $1,000,000 revenue in the year 2008. The primary market for the blast modules developed under this SBIR would primarily be other DoD organizations in the U.S.  For example, DTRA develops and maintains the IMEA software for offensive targeting needs. The new modules have direct application to IMEA and other similar software environments.  Additionally, HFPB modeling of HSC and UHSC structures is an increasingly important area for a number of DoD agencies.  WAI anticipates that the increased experience and validation that will result from this effort will directly result in increasing WAIs consulting business in this area.  WAI also anticipates an increase in sales of the NLFlex software to government groups interested in HFPB modeling of HSC and UHSC materials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

82 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2015). Reported award amounts total $21,696,566. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.