SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Tensioned Phased Array Structural Technologies

Award identifier 6acc9cb0fca9f881b9b29d8dffad9c882deb5e2c0b2bbc5935fa622e33fd7c8fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,995

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
L'GARDE, INC.
Proposal award date
2009-02-12
Contract end date
2010-02-15
UEI
LEUWTPVHDXA8
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-211

Research abstract

LGarde will develop a technology to enable the tensioning of planar phased array systems maintaining their planarity to within 1 mm rms.  This will mitigate the use of expensive and bulky metrology and RF compensation systems.  Effort will be focused on the cable-net configuration because of its low mass compared with other configurations.  The design concept will concentrate on the 10 m^2 and 50 m^2 arrays and will be tailored to meet input mission requirements from AFRL.  This design concept is scalable to much larger tensioned phased array systems greater than 40 m x 40 m.  LGarde recognizes the potential pay off of such structures and, hence, will fund the building of a subscale prototype using our IR&D funds. However, the testing of the prototype that includes measurement of its planarity, use it for packaging and folding exercises, and measure its stiffness and damping characteristics, will be carried out under the proposal work plan. BENEFIT: The tensioned cable-net systems that are envisaged maybe be used in both commercial and military applications. On the commercial level, these tensioned apertures are useful for marine, commerce, identification and tracking missions, Earth science radar, communications, imaging, and other remote sensing applications. LGardes approach to commercialize these systems includes partnering with the Air Force to develop cost efficient fabrication techniques and to market the apertures to the largest possible market.  Initially, the size of these structures would be small, from 10 m^2 to 50 m^2, but the success of Phase I will allow the development of larger systems in Phase II and Phase III. Therefore, further development of this hardware technology is essential to future space and Earth structures efforts. LGardes strategy is to demonstrate, to both space and Earth-bound projects, the validity and value of this study. In addition, it is expected that this technology will sell itself once fully developed. For the first time ever, the aerospace community will have tensioned structures that offer high performance compared with current backing structures. The study of the tensioned cable-net system in Phase I will demonstrate the capabilities of the technology and serve as a powerful marketing tool in itself.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

67 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $21,901,140. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.