SBIR/STTR Research Award

Lightweight Solar Array Structure for Thin Multijunction Solar Cells

Award identifier 9bb0d67021f7749259a9d92e5373e58a71e064465d22708b847bd4e5c7e7196cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,940

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Deployable Space Systems, Inc.
Proposal award date
2008-05-09
Contract end date
2009-03-16
UEI
EHJJDG7BA2X3
Solicitation number
2008.1
Topic code
AF081-092

Research abstract

Future military and commercial spacecraft missions are driving the need for power generation systems that can provide extremely high specific power (W/kg), ultra-low stowage volume (kW/m3), extremely high power capability, high reliability, and affordability. Current state-of-the-art optimized solar arrays rely on heavy composite honeycomb structures and are approaching performance plateaus (~100W/kg and ~13kW/m3). The recent technology development of high-efficiency ultra-thin multijunction solar cells (~20um thickness) with projected 33% efficiency allows for a dramatic optimization of the deployable solar array structural system. Ultra-thin multijunction solar cells when combined with an appropriately optimized deployable structure promises to produce a solar array system that provides specific power in excess of 500 W/kg and stowed packaging efficiency greater than 40 kW/m3. The proposed Phase 1 effort will establish concept feasibility of an innovative tensioned membrane solar array system structure and increase its technology readiness level for future development efforts. The tensioned membrane solar array system provides significant performance improvements over current state-of-the-art solar array technologies and enables future mission applications. BENEFIT: The proposed Tensioned Membrane solar array promises to provide high specific power, compact stowage volume, high reliability, and affordability when compared to current state-of-the-art systems. The discriminating performance will enable future missions. The proposed technology has the potential to ultimately replace existing solar array systems currently used for most Military, civilian, and commercial applications. The total solar array system market is estimated at $500M to $750M annually, yielding a high return on investment for commercial infusion of the proposed technology. In addition to the aforementioned tangible performance benefits the reduction in solar array mass and stowage volume will reduce launch costs, minimize satellite dynamics/controls overhead, and enhance orbital maneuvering capabilities. These intangible benefits will provide affordability and improved capabilities for future high power missions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

56 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2020). Reported award amounts total $22,468,270. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.