SBIR/STTR Research Award

Automated ENCON Assessment & Optimization Decision Support Tool

Award identifier aa7092216d8bef35a4bd8eee1eb409de8106ceffeb7c6bbc76fbaf032588247fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$69,831

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Impact Technologies
Proposal award date
2007-11-06
Contract end date
2008-05-16
UEI
T1JNUWJLN5M1
Solicitation number
2007.1
Topic code
N07-060

Research abstract

Energy Conservation (ENCON) measures currently employed by Navy surface combatants require labor-intensive, time-consuming data entry from which fuel curves are generated for each ship’s propulsion plant machinery alignment. From these rudimentary curves optimal transit speeds, configurations, and refueling requirements are determined for specific operational demands and mission profiles. Impact Technologies, LLC proposes to automate this process by interfacing with ICAS and other existing shipboard information systems and use diagnostics and maintenance information to minimize fuel consumption. The automated ENCON assessment & optimization decision support tool will address all fossil fuel propulsion (gas turbines, steam turbines and diesel engines), power generation and auxiliary systems. The tool will consist of Diagnostics, Fuel Management and Maintenance modules. The Diagnostics module will track the health state of those components that use fuel and their supporting systems to provide real-time information on the impact of their current condition on fuel consumption. The Fuel Management module will automate data collection and the generation of fuel curves through open-systems architecture communication with ICAS. It will also enable underway planning by recommending an optimal machinery configuration to minimize fuel consumption based on either speed or time to destination constraints. Additionally, the Fuel Management module will provide real-time information on fuel consumption as well as optimize the load of each component based on its health condition, operating requirements and the number and condition of similar components. Moreover, fuel consumption at the component level will be monitored and trended. The third component of the decision tool is the Maintenance module that will track the maintenance actions being performed on fuel consuming systems and recommend maintenance to be performed based on current health information and from a fuel conservation standpoint. This decision support tool will function within the ICAS environment thus alleviating the need for dedicated hardware and will require very limited operator training.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

232 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2014). Reported award amounts total $76,299,884. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.