SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Novel High Interlaminar Strength Carbon-Carbon Composites for Advanced Rocket Propulsion Components: Nozzle Materials and Exit Cones

Award identifier 6b768526916c4962921bf147b42ce8a1f99bd43bad47735f6b2d736c4d78e2a7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,994

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
MATERIALS RESEARCH & DESIGN INC
Proposal award date
2007-09-28
Contract end date
2009-10-08
UEI
QU1NM7F1CDV4
Solicitation number
2006.1
Topic code
AF06-193

Research abstract

A program involving analysis and design, reinforcement materials research and development, composite fabrication, and composite property testing is proposed here to develop improved interlaminar properties of carbon-carbon composites used as the substrates for rocket propulsion components, such as exit cones and nozzle throats. The improved interlaminar properties must be obtained with minimal impact on the in-plane properties of the C-C composites. The most important technical objective that must be achieved to satisfy the primary objective of the proposed program is the successful further development of the concept of the discontinuous carbon fiber reinforcement interleaf material manufactured by Energy Sciences Laboratories, Inc. (ESLI) on San Diego, CA. The focus of the ESLI reinforcement interleaf material development is to achieve high interlaminar properties, low impact on in-plane properties, manufacturing scale-up to reasonable sizes, and cost affordability. A measure of success is the magnitude of interlaminar reinforcement properties improvement for similar impact on in-plane properties relative to competing technology such as stretch-broken fabric and needled fabric preforms. To provide the best assessment of the reinforcement interleaf technique to enhanced interlaminar properties, the proposed Phase II effort will procure stretch-broken and needled fabric reinforcement, along with continuous 2D carbon fabrics. C-C composites will be fabricated using no interlaminar reinforcement, two different types of reinforcement interleaf materials developed and fabricated by ESLI, stretch-broken fabric and needle-punched fabric. Mechanical property measurements, including both in-plane and interlaminar properties, will be performed to enable an assessment of the improved interlaminar properties and the reductions in in-plane properties associated with all of these composites. Finally, C-C exit cone designs will be developed for all of these reinforcement methods and their associated composite properties, to determine an analytical assessment of the minimum weight design achieved by the various reinforcement methods.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

133 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $60,564,982. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.