SBIR/STTR Research Award

Automation of Strategic Planning Frameworks

Award identifier 1811ae87057f48b0cdf4f5882ed8d05a9d56ca4b5722f33518b3dd2505540b76Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$99,505

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
Logos Technologies LLC
Proposal award date
2007-09-28
Contract end date
2008-09-28
UEI
LJQ8Y1VPT9W4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
OSD07-T001

Research abstract

Based on both operational lessons learned and experimental analyses there is a strong requirement for more innovative means to support USG interagency planning and assessment of stabilization and reconstruction operations, as well as to illustrate to both USG and the non-government community the adaptive nature of chosen defense, diplomacy and development plans and tasks within a complex engagement space. The objective of this proposal is to highlight to the US military and their USG inter-agency partners an innovative concept and methodology for an automated capability to employ the principles and framework described in the USG Draft Planning for Reconstruction, Stabilization and Conflict Transformation, version 1.0, (USG R/S) as well as the Essential Task List (ETL). Phase 1 will provide strategic and theatre-level operational planners with a conceptual systematic approach that will represent, categorize and translate USG objectives into sound, executable strategies and tasks. It will then present a tool suite that visualize the USG R/S and the ETL into easily understood and practicable applications for planners to efficiently enter and understand: a) policy goals; b) strategic aims; c) operational end-states; and d) associated evaluation criteria to then select individual tasks defining Major Mission Elements, linked to applicable goals, aims and end-states. Phase 2 will further refine and prototype this effort within concept development and experimentation venues, such as Unified Action and Multinational Experiment 5. This entails a two-fold analytical approach that is unique to the field: first the project will begin to integrate a risk outlook methodology that will apply modeling capabilities that illustrate to policymakers and operators the dependency relationships amongst plans and tasks and therefore the `risk' associated with decisions to take one course of action to achieve a strategic aim versus another (or) the decision to emphasize one task versus another. Second, the project will enhance its collaborative capability to include bi-level classification situation awareness `pages' that allow for both situational awareness and inputs from USG and non-government organizations. This is a truly interagency concept that proposes the integration of several methodologies and tool-suites.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2020). Reported award amounts total $4,690,513. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.