SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enabling Electrostatic Painting of Automotive Polymers with Low Cost Carbon Nanofibers

Award identifier 2accfcfbbe5ca6e9e40f7d30de7aba891f9ee762f5cf2d9eff8b4731ee451debAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$224,988

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Applied Sciences Inc.
Proposal award date
2007-05-01
Contract end date
2009-04-30
UEI
KFNNH3CBM7Q9
Solicitation number
PR-NC-06-10459
Topic code
06-NCER-P1

Research abstract

Applied Sciences, Inc. (ASI) investigated the use of inexpensive carbon nanofiber (CNF) to impart electrical conductivity to polymer systems to allow the use of electrostatic painting (ESP) techniques to paint these polymers in the same manner as metals without the need for a solvent- based primer coat. The production of polymer composites that can be electrostatically painted with no additional processing steps will remove a major barrier to the replacement of metal parts with composites parts on automobiles. The full development of this technology will increase the use of composite components in the automotive industry, which is in consonance with the efforts of the automotive industry to reduce weight, increase fuel efficiency, and eliminate corrosion while maintaining appearance, performance, and low-cost. Incorporating carbon nanofiber into polymers at low loadings is known to create composites that can carry electrical currents while simultaneously increasing mechanical properties. Composites produced from a variety of commercially available composite fabrication techniques (e.g., injection molding, compression molding, long fiber thermoplastics processing, sprayable gelcoat); different polymers (PP, PEEK, PC, Nylon, PE); and carbon nanofiber types and grades were tested under this program. The composites tested all had electrical conductivities between 10-4 to 10-6 S/cm, with loadings as low as 2 weight percent of carbon nanofiber. The conductive composites were painted using ESP techniques, and then tested for surface finish quality, adhesion, and abrasion resistance. The conductive composites received the paint with no alterations in the painting process and behaved similarly to metal. The CNF neither affected the surface quality, nor did it impact the adhesion of the paint to the composite surface. The best nanofiber variant proved to be the XT version, and the best processing methods were the long fiber thermoplastics processing and the sprayable gelcoat. The sprayable gelcoat allows the ability to selectively place conductivity at the surface of the composite. Overall, the program was successful in demonstrating that composites made conductive with the addition of CNF can be electrostatically painted without the addition of a conductive primer coat. Elimination of the conductive primer will eliminate approximately 0.23 lbs of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission per automobile, or about 18 percent of the total VOC emissions related to painting and finishing. ESP of polymers will reduce manufacturing costs by about $100 per vehicle. The net present value of this is conservatively estimated at $500 M for the industry over the next 15 years. Ultimate savings could reach $2 B annually. Conductive composites have further potential of being used in numerous under-the-hood applications and other areas where electrical conductivity is needed, and more widely as electronic enclosures, composite electrostatic precipitators, anti/deicing heaters for aircraft, and anti-static flooring, countertops, and truck bed liners. ASI and its partners will pursue further cost-reduction strategies in Phase II to enhance the attractiveness of this technology. Technical advances and increased production capacity developed during the Phase II effort are expected to increase this cost savings.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

128 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2022). Reported award amounts total $29,010,302. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.