SBIR/STTR Research Award

Small Scale Ethanol Drying

Award identifier 6811a5c642853c08e1dee52db9cf5d9afaf04794939e7a2a4ad7ea8ccbbc2ed9Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
2007-03-01
Contract end date
2007-08-31
UEI
JDNRH32DML47
Solicitation number
PR-NC-06-10207
Topic code
06-NCER-B3

Research abstract

There continues to be a need for the production of fuel-grade ethanol from agricultural sources. The Federal Government is actively looking for biomass renewable feed stocks for enhancing gasoline and reducing our dependence on foreign oil. Ethanol from agricultural sources has many advantages, including fuel independence and its significant value as an oxygenate and octane improver. Unlike gasoline, ethanol does not generate net greenhouse gases. Also, with significant environmental pressure to move away from MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether) as an oxygenate because of its environmental impact, there is further need for ethanol. Despite a significant need for ethanol, the cost of agriculture-based ethanol, and most specifically, the energy costs associated with developing dry fuel-grade ethanol, are quite severe. Existing and new legislation provides significant incentives for use of fuel-grade ethanol. Costs for manufacturing fuel-grade ethanol, especially on small facilities, are significant. Membrane processes are ideal for small applications because the associated pumps scale down linearly. Therefore, while many existing biomass-to-ethanol plants are at 40 million gallons per year or greater and very few are at 10 million gallons per year, a membrane process focused on fuel-grade ethanol membranes would be the most advantageous. The product concept associated with this program is to operate primarily membrane and related processes to convert low volumes of biomass to fuel-grade ethanol. In Phase I, we will demonstrate all key components of the membrane process on water-ethanol streams. Using these basic data, we will facilitate an engineering evaluation to determine overall process costs. Our objective is to demonstrate a membrane process that is superior to any other process for 10 million gallons per year operations and to show that costs for fuel-grade ethanol at 10 million gallons per year are within 10 percent of those of a large-scale (40 million gallons per year) facility. Compact Membrane Systems has established key industrial relationships with both membrane companies and ethanol engineering design firms. These relationships will be helpful in this project and in subsequent commercialization.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

218 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2021). Reported award amounts total $55,705,610. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.