SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-Performance Deorbit Engine with Minimal Power Requirements, Phase II

Award identifier d781a2a61c41b9f9d3c3e43a0aa71e48a5dce8f71a8b4c8c2ba7c3a5960737b8Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$849,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
2025-08-04
Contract end date
2027-08-04
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
SBIR 2024-II
Topic code
Z8

Research abstract

Deorbiting a satellite generally involves either applying drag or using a propulsion system. The orbit height and the satellite mass and “frontal area” will determine the velocity change requirement and the time frame over which a satellite will deorbit. The minimum-mass solution for a satellite in a higher orbit will involve the use of both drag and propulsion: a propulsion system to lower the orbit and then atmospheric drag to further slow the spacecraft and complete the deorbit. In this project, Ultramet is focusing on the propulsion system. Specifically, Ultramet is leveraging its existing green propulsion technology and its high-reliability low temperature ignition system that is being developed for the Air Force, and applying them to the development of a high specific impulse (>300 sec) hybrid rocket with low size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP C) that can be used to lower the orbit of satellites to the point where atmospheric drag can complete the deorbiting process. In Phase I, numerous liquid oxidizers and hypergolic fuels were assessed, and a model was developed to calculate the propulsion system mass needed to lower the orbit of a satellite of arbitrary mass and frontal area from any orbital height so that atmospheric drag would complete the deorbit within the required five-year period. The most promising candidates were downselected, and bench-scale testing demonstrated hypergolic reactivity between the liquid oxidizer and the fuel grain where the downselected combination has a theoretical Isp of 320 sec. Hot-fire testing of a subscale engine was performed, which again demonstrated the reactivity between the liquid oxidizer and the fuel grain. In Phase II, the structure and composition of the hypergolic fuel grain will be optimized to maximize performance, and the system will be scaled up and hot-fire tested. Using data from the testing, a larger system will be designed to accommodate larger/heavier satellites and/or those in higher orbits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.