SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Lightweight and Low Cost Advanced Structural Materials for Off-board Surface Vessels (OBVs)

Award identifier a1794fa8d127619fd59650a1cef03f74c439f68a86839db9a6181b52a2e51c9fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$99,999

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Applied Physical Sciences Corp.
Proposal award date
2006-08-01
Contract end date
2007-05-31
UEI
R494GGV1AEM8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
N06-T021

Research abstract

Off-board vehicles deployed in littoral environments are subjected to severe operational loads, including wave slamming, high-speed collision with debris, and underwater explosions. They additionally serve as sensor platforms, and would benefit from reduced self- and radiated noise for towed array performance and mine defense. Consequently, we propose to exploit the flexibility of design offered by modern composites to achieve a novel OBV hull design integrating beneficial structural, shock, and stealth characteristics. Novel design features are threefold. First, the composite hull cross-section contains a compliant viscoelastic core material offering isolation from low-level transient events and acoustic isolation and damping, in addition to its structural function. Second, we propose a novel composite stiffener design that integrates structural function with large shock protection, by minimizing stress concentrations at structural discontinuities. Third, to address the occurrence of stress concentrations at geometric discontinuities state-of-the-art forming techniques are proposed that allow for the fabrication of highly curved junctions without appreciable loss of strength. Our proposed Phase I effort includes concept performance predictions (Applied Physical Sciences, Inc), static and dynamic validation tests (University of Massachusetts- Advanced Composite Materials and Textiles Research Laboratory), and a benefit trade-off analysis against weight and cost (Marine Applied Physics Corporation.) BENEFITS: The successful completion of the proposed effort will yield a composite hull design that significantly improves the shock and impact survivability and sensor related mission performance of the Navy's OBV or similar marine vehicles. Certain of our novel hull design features may be patentable and have application to small commercial or pleasure boats, e.g. our composite forming technique or integrated stiffener-mount design.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

57 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2013). Reported award amounts total $14,826,866. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

APPLIED PHYSICAL SCIENCES CORP

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.