SBIR/STTR Research Award

Fish Net Penetration by UUVs

Award identifier ded08266399a4274a20505f9be935551f1de9a40e59df8c8dbfc0e58bbe9f192Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$99,931

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ADAPTIVE METHODS, INC.
Proposal award date
2006-05-05
Contract end date
2007-08-03
UEI
KVNLHF7DEVX9
Solicitation number
2006.1
Topic code
N06-054

Research abstract

According to The Navy’s Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Master Plan updated in 2004, UUV’s will perform important, force multiplying missions such as intelligence, surveillance, mine countermeasures, tactical oceanography, navigation and anti-submarine warfare. The missions they perform will be autonomous, low risk, and have low observability which will reduce risk to our forces. UUV’s can penetrate enemy harbors and shallow littoral waters where submarines could be easily detected or which is simply just too shallow to operate. It is predicted that hundreds if not thousands of UUV’s will be required to perform these missions. Often, while operating in littoral waters, UUV’s can be entrapped in fishing nets and other debris incurring delays or even causing mission failure. In response to SBIR solicitation N06-054, Adaptive Methods describes in this proposal the work required in a Phase I effort to develop a design for net penetrating equipment (NPE). The design will be capable of multiple penetrations of various types of fishing nets, will minimize integration with existing designs and be scaleable to fit different size UUV’s which will help them to operate freely in all environments. BENEFITS: Benefits: NPE technology will allow UUV’s, both military and commercial, to operate freely in littoral waters performing critical missions with lower risk, lower cost, and with a much greater probability of success. The risk of UUV’s being unrecoverable due to net entrapment will also be minimized. The number of UUV’s performing these critical missions will dramatically increase in the future, along with the demand for NPE technology. Commercialization: In the near future, estimates of the number of domestic, non-military ships, which could use NPE technology, will easily reach 500. World wide, the total number could easily be 2 to 3 times greater. Future UUV requirements for both the military and commercial sectors will probably be in the thousands which will provide a healthy market for NPE technology.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

93 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2017). Reported award amounts total $41,920,418. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

L3 ADAPTIVE METHODS, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.