SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rugged Next Generation Composite False Deck System For Lightweight, Fire & Shock-Proof Elevated Open Spaces

Award identifier 4d014bd71cf6ec1dea28d986dc759e90571637417d83ed9e3f8cccd7d5b25fc8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
KaZaK Composites Incorporated
Proposal award date
2006-05-04
Contract end date
2007-07-30
UEI
NE6AZWKUS6Z7
Solicitation number
2006.1
Topic code
N06-058

Research abstract

Navy elevated deck structures utilize lightweight, fire-resistant composite deck tiles for walking surfaces. Current Nomex-cored glass/phenolic sandwich baseline panels are expensive, need special edge treatments after cutting to shape, and are frequently damaged by chipping at their thin edges. KaZaK has identified attractive pultrudable alternatives that can be used for the next generation of tough, inexpensive deck tiles. KaZaK designs will meet or exceed current system requirements, including weight and FST. Our designs will not require edge treatments when cut, will be considerably more resistant to the types of damage that destroy the current panels, and will permit panels to be repaired while underway and/or pier-side. KaZaK will also investigate alternative tile-to-sub-frame attachment schemes to meet shock requirements and improve below-deck access for ship system maintenance. KaZaK’s Phase I endeavors will focus on design, fabrication and testing of prototype deck panel hardware intended as a part-for-part replacement of existing DDG Nomex sandwich deck panels. Phase I panels will be designed to mount to the existing aluminum substructure. Some consideration in Phase I will also be given to redesign of an optimized substructure for the next generation panel system that will be developed in Phase II.BENEFITS: Military and commercial applications of elevated deck tiles that are lightweight, structurally stiff and fire resistant have enormous potential. Navy ships utilize elevated deck systems to permit communication, electrical and HVAC systems to run underneath the false deck. This practice is repeated throughout the Navy fleet. In addition, Navy and commercial ship joiner bulkheads, built in accommodations and moveable dividers are all markets for a tough, fire resistant and lightweight composite panels. The Army would be interested in these panels for portable shelters to support housing, medical, and storage facilities. In addition, these large composite panels could be used in the commercial construction market providing fire resistant cubicles, room dividers and nonstructural wall partitions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

156 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2011). Reported award amounts total $40,421,900. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.