SBIR/STTR Research Award

Sonobuoy – Electronic Function Selector (EFS) Replacement

Award identifier 4303c39267f37f30ca06b7b3b312d0859bbc760480800adbee14928344373e90Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$146,882

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
SEACORP, LLC
Proposal award date
2006-04-26
Contract end date
2008-01-18
UEI
DMPKMH1MFSQ1
Solicitation number
2006.1
Topic code
N06-010

Research abstract

Present sonobuoys allow for the selection of functions such as RF Channel, Depth, etc. by use of a single selector button and LED display along with a second button used for verification located on the side of the sonobuoy. Selection or verification requires access to the buttons and cannot be accomplished once the sonobuoy is loaded into the launcher. The capability to select and verify functions using a wireless, battery-operated, handheld device useable in low light conditions that can interface to a standard personal computer (PC) has been deemed desirable for future sonobuoys by NAVAIR. Additionally, this capability should be adaptable to the multi-mission maritime aircraft (MMA) so that programming and verification can be accomplished via direct interface with the mission computer while the sonobuoy is in the launcher and while the aircraft is in flight. SEA CORP will investigate the application of innovative technologies to accomplishing wireless programming via a handheld device. The SEA CORP solution will address specific requirements for battery-powered and low light capability. It will cost under $200 and provide PC interface with adaptability to the MMA. Reliability and the ability to operate in various environments are key factors that will be addressed. BENEFITS: Existing sonobuoys with operator-select functionality require presets to be selected prior to tube-loading by a technician. Once these presets are selected at the sonobuoy, an additional step is required to communicate these selections to the on-board flight crew. The flight crew then must input these presets into the launch control software. The ability to program the sonobuoy with a handheld device and to download these presets directly into the MMA mission computer eliminates significant potential for miscommunication. Further, having the option of altering these presets while the sonobuoy is in the launch tube provides the option of ensuring the sonobuoy is properly set to take advantage of the prevailing oceanographic acoustic environment. The ability to maintain the tactical advantage in any given oceanographic environment is the primary factor in maintenance of supremacy in the undersea battlespace.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

34 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2022). Reported award amounts total $15,529,883. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Education

Contractor profile

SEACORP, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.