SBIR/STTR Research Award

Multiplexed Chemical Sensor for Water Security

Award identifier cb579d579b097fb1a25dc2fc3c29ed20d7d92eddcf44e71c9b885bb465a8c59cAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$224,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
REAL-TIME ANALYZERS INC
Proposal award date
2006-04-01
Contract end date
2007-06-30
UEI
TDNXM9CDFMA6
Solicitation number
PR-NC-05-10444
Topic code
05-NCER-P1

Research abstract

The goal of this Phase II research project is to provide municipal authorities and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with a chemical sensor that can be multiplexed into water distribution systems to provide early warning of poisoned water supplies. This will be accomplished by developing surface-enhanced Raman (SER) sensors that can be integrated into water supply systems and coupled to a central Raman analyzer via fiber optics. All of the test chemicals, pesticides, chemical agent hydrolysis products, and cyanide were measured at the Phase I detection goal of 1 ppm (1 mg/L) within 5 minutes. The estimated limits of detection suggest that the Phase II detection goal of 10 ppb (0.01 mg/L or 0.01 ppm) can be obtained. Furthermore, in the case of cyanide, a 10 ppb flowing sample was detected in 1 minute. The overall goal of Phase II will be to fully develop the proposed analyzer and improve sensitivity to allow detection at 10 microorganisms/L in 10 minutes. (This meets or exceeds requirements for drinking water.) The project will include: ruggidizing the SER-active, sol-gel capillaries; developing a universal sampling system with a fiber optic probe interface; and developing comprehensive analysis that includes rapid chemical identification. Capabilities will be developed using real-world samples from a drinking water distribution system and water supply. An additional field test, performed at the U.S. Army’s Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, will involve the analysis of HD and VX (chemical agents) added to a close-loop water test system. In addition to the proposed application of monitoring water supplies to ensure safe drinking water, the proposed analyzer could be used by the military to ensure water safety of local supplies, and by first responders to assess safety of any water supply. Although the analyzer does not detect poisons, it will perform dual-use duty by monitoring traditional contaminants of concern (e.g., chlorinated organics generated by disinfection operations, cyanide by leaching operations, and chromium by plating operations).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

42 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2023). Reported award amounts total $15,689,645. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.