SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enhanced Ethanol Diesel Blend for Emission Reduction

Award identifier ce2640336baebdb90af644fe58769e1f733db358313fa8b69d60e79f03a4f87fAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
2006-03-01
Contract end date
2006-08-31
UEI
JDNRH32DML47
Solicitation number
PR-NC-05-10246
Topic code
05-NCER-B2

Research abstract

New engine diesel pollution is addressed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean Diesel Truck and Buses, low sulfur diesel, and nonroad diesel rules. Unfortunately, slow fleet turnover will extend full implementation. EPA is interested in both retrofit technologies that reduce emissions (particulate matter, volatile organic pollutants, NOx) from diesel sources and new biodiesel implementation technologies. In this Phase I project, Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. (CMS) will address both of these issues. Ethanol-diesel fuel blends have shown that they can reduce many emissions (particulate matter, volatile organic pollutants, CO) by more than 20 percent. Unfortunately, the ethanol-diesel (e-diesel) fuels do not affect significantly NOx emissions. CMS proposes the simultaneous use of e-diesel fuels with retrofit membrane technology. The latter retrofit membrane technology already has demonstrated an ability to reduce NOx emissions by more than 50 percent with no significant change in other emissions. Both e-diesels and CMS membranes are easily retrofitable technology, which is one to EPA’s key objectives. In addition, ethanol prices ($/gallon) are significantly lower than other biodiesel sources, and ethanol’s BTU/$ is much higher than other biodiesels. This project therefore addresses a second EPA objective related to low-cost biodiesel production technologies. There also is special synergy between CMS technology and e-diesel. E-diesel is a more combustible mixture and using nitrogen-enriched air from CMS membrane reduces or controls the e-diesel combustibility, which is desirable. In Phase I, CMS will demonstrate on a 20 kw Lister-Petter diesel engine using an appropriate ethanol-diesel fuel blend and appropriate controls that low-cost, ethanol-based biodiesel in combustion with novel CMS retrofit membrane broadly reduces emissions by at least 20 percent across the board with no significant (less than 2 percent) fuel penalty. CMS has established key relationships with major industrial and industrial membrane companies. These relationships will enhance CMS’s ability to be successful in Phase I/Phase II and subsequent downstream production.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

218 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2021). Reported award amounts total $55,705,610. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.