SBIR/STTR Research Award

Communication Links for Spatially Distributed ASW Sensor Systems

Award identifier 309641fd7314b86581bb8b257dc62f677005a20c2bdf4c4189562ea01174b4e5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$1,029,930

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
BENTHOS, INC.
Proposal award date
2006-01-19
Contract end date
2009-03-30
UEI
DJ72XMAJLNL4
Solicitation number
2003.2
Topic code
N03-224

Research abstract

The Navy intends to develop distributed fields of underwater sensors devoted primarily to ASW. These fields may include stationary nodes and/or mobile nodes, but will have the need to move data among the nodes in the field and to reconfigure the system to respond to an evolving threat situation. There are instances in which this network connectivity can be accomplished with hardwire links, but in the majority of cases, acoustic communication will be the preferred method. Our goal is to develop the infrastructure to support robust, clandestine network-wide data fusion and data transmission to the end user. Our Phase 1 proposal listed five requirements in the statement of work: 1. Develop the top-level protocols necessary to enable asynchronous, CDMA-based acomms, and refine the existing CDMA signaling to support these protocols. 2. Evaluate requirements for high data rate signaling. 3. Redesign the electronic and acoustic characteristics of the modem to support dual frequency operations (full duplex). 4. Develop the top level protocols necessary to support dual band signaling. 5. Evaluate the requirements for modem-based, in-situ signal processing and data fusion and identify algorithms to satisfy those requirements. Each of these issues were addressed in the Phase 1 study, but the emphasis quickly became the design of a new generation modem able to satisfy the requirements derived from our analyses. The current Benthos modem is the ATM 88x series, a successful and reliable tool which was developed over many years under SBIR, BAA, and IR&D funding. It is, by far, the most versatile acoustic modem available anywhere. However, the demand for acoustic communications is increasing at a rapid pace, and the capabilities of the existing infrastructure simply are inadequate for many of the new applications. The present ASW application is an ideal example: in order to support distributed sensors in an integrated network, a dual band telemetry system is required. However, the existing modem cannot provide this capability. In summary, the Navy requires autonomous underwater systems which can collect environmental data, provide surveillance functions, and provide C2 and data connectivity with the outside world.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2006). Reported award amounts total $4,998,907. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.