SBIR/STTR Research Award

In vivo imaging platform for DM1 drug discovery

Award identifier eb34e22c90a98ca65abbd25c8e027869f07ebeac9692ef27bf7baf91f4db316eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$313,148

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
LUCERNA INC
Proposal award date
2025-08-01
Contract end date
2026-07-31
UEI
J3MWGA6WFCG3
Solicitation number
PA24-245
Topic code
NIAMS

Research abstract

PROJECT ABSTRACT/SUMMARY Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystemic disorder caused by CUG repeat expansion in the 3’ UTR of the DMPK gene. DM1 patients can have between 50 to 5,000 CUG repeats, leading to DMPK mRNA aggregation within the nucleus. These ribonuclear clusters, termed foci, sequester several splicing factors, such as muscleblind-like (MBNL) proteins, and transcription factors, leading to dysregulation of splicing, miRNA and circRNA formation, and mRNA location and stability. DM1 is the most common adult form of muscular dystrophy and affects 1 in 8,000 people worldwide. There is currently no cure for DM1 and treatment consists of symptom management. Recent advances in RNA-focused drug library design and screening tools now allow better, more biologically relevant hit screening that overcome traditional protein-based drug discovery approaches. However, appropriate animal models for efficient preclinical testing of RNA-focused drug candidates remained lacking. Pharmacokinetic and target engagement studies for every new drug candidate still rely on biochemical measurements in harvested tissues, which is expensive, time consuming, and requires large numbers of animal sacrifice. There is currently no in vivo model capable of monitoring toxic foci and MBNL sequestration, the trigger of DM1 disease phenotype, in real time high-throughput format, and in a non-invasive manner to limit the number of animals needed. The goal of this SBIR Phase I project to develop an in vivo reporter platform that allows more efficient evaluation of triaged drugs and lead compounds for target engagement and other PK metrics. We will use our proprietary fluorogenic RNA aptamer technology to develop in vivo reporters that can detect drug-induced changes in toxic foci formation and CUG-MBNL interaction. In Phase, I we will demonstrate the feasibility of the in vivo reporter system in DM1 model cell lines and animal model and in Phase II, we will generate transgenic reporter animals, perform preclinical testing with collaborator lead compounds, and expand the platform capability toward other microsatellite diseases.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2025). Reported award amounts total $10,266,039. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.