SBIR/STTR Research Award

Integrated Shipboard and Shore-Based Maintenance Management Decision Tool

Award identifier 66d0f424fc1881620d766c363a9a29dd2c9fbda07bc967f2af023fb4b68b4a72Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$99,559

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Impact Technologies
Proposal award date
2005-04-28
Contract end date
2005-10-27
UEI
T1JNUWJLN5M1
Solicitation number
2005.1
Topic code
N05-051

Research abstract

Impact Technologies, in collaboration with Rolls Royce Naval Marine (support letter attached) and Life Cycle Engineering (LCE), propose the development and demonstration of a shipboard and shore-based maintenance decision tool that can autonomously and optimally select and schedule maintenance actions for Naval Ship Systems from a readiness and cost/benefit perspective. The proposed strategies will include the capability to account for risk across critical shipboard systems, integration with CBM systems, and procedures for maximizing ship system readiness based on mission requirements. Specific ties to economic models for assessing total operations/support cost and optimization modules for autonomous maintenance task selection and resource scheduling are also proposed. These developments will be eventually implemented within the framework of a maintenance decision support software product that will provide engineering and financial justification for maintenance and support decisions. The maintenance management optimization software will utilize various levels of engineering analysis based on shipboard system health indices/status that are coupled with comprehensive economic models that will form the basis of the automated maintenance optimization process. Two collaborating approaches will be investigated in the Phase I program. The first approach will utilize the predictions on remaining useful life or degradation levels (prognostics) of critical ship systems to project risk at any time in the future. The resulting fault/failure probabilities will then be processed with an economic model to determine the most cost effective maintenance actions to perform at specific times in the future. The second approach utilizes a model-based reasoning algorithm that assesses the cause and effect relationships among all predisposing factors influencing maintenance decisions. Based on the Phase I results, the Phase II program will focus on specific applications on DD(X) such as the Main Turbine System (MTS), which Impact is currently working on maintenance reasoning software for Rolls Royce Naval Marine and Northrop Grumman.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

232 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2014). Reported award amounts total $76,299,884. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.