SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Metal Shaping Process Using Non-Toxic Working Fluids

Award identifier b7ea153f020a44f6960d598e271f7f1e5cbe5daed0609dc0cd4a91eaf2ab77caAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$69,882

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Faraday Technology, Inc.
Proposal award date
2005-03-01
Contract end date
2005-08-31
UEI
ZL5LDDLNHGN4
Solicitation number
PR-NC-04-10309
Topic code
04-NCER-A2

Research abstract

This research project addresses worker and environmental safety concerns regarding the use of toxic cutting fluids in metal shaping operations. The toxicity of cutting fluids can be caused by either the constituents of the cutting fluid chemistry, or in the case of water-soluble emulsions, the biocides intended to control bacterial growth. Faraday Technology, Inc., intends to adapt an advanced electrochemical edge- and surface-finishing technology to provide a robust, cost-effective, high-volume metal removal process that does not require toxic chemicals. The project will address the common challenges associated with electrochemical processing, namely dimensional control and surface finish, by applying a user-defined, pulsed electric field to control the metal dissolution pattern as opposed to relying on chemical means. Furthermore, the electrolytes used in this process do not foster bacterial growth so the need for toxic biocides is eliminated. In addition to eliminating the need for toxic cutting fluids, Faraday will provide the following advantages over conventional machining processes: (1) complex geometries can be machined in a single pass; (2) the surface finish is excellent; and (3) the surface is burr-free and stress-free. To complete the life cycle assessment of the process, the metal waste can be removed from the electrolyte using both physical and electrochemical means providing an enriched material for reuse programs. The effluent from this filtration step is introduced back into the circulation loop. The anticipated results of the Phase I and Phase II efforts include: (1) the development and commercialization of an electrochemical technology that can machine metals, such as carbon steel, in the presence of nontoxic electrolytes; (2) the development of an electrolyte management strategy; and (3) the development of a metal reclamation strategy. This electrochemical technology will be applicable to a wide range of metals for the automotive, military, commercial aircraft, and other industries. The advantages of this technology will be most prominent in components that have complex geometry and/or require excellent surface finishes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

202 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2025). Reported award amounts total $72,052,120. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.