SBIR/STTR Research Award

Probabilistic BMC4I Algorithms for Modeling BMD Uncertainties

Award identifier 655780f3c9f2c8463bd71a1a7009907cd78ac2a3659ca392a0266627125d7a37Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$749,966

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
TECHFINITY, INC.
Proposal award date
2004-08-31
Contract end date
2006-08-30
UEI
DWDVTL54J9D8
Solicitation number
2002.2
Topic code
MDA02-037b

Research abstract

A key component of any ballistic missile defense system is the decision architecture of what to intercept, where to intercept, when to intercept and which weapon system to use. The key pieces of information that drive the decision as to the "what", "where", and "when" are: (1) what is the threat (its lethality and what does it threaten); and (2) what is the probability of kill. To this end, a key building block is Probabilistic Battle Space Analysis (PBSA). The focus of this effort determines the shot opportunities for various firing doctrines, representing BMD errors into a mean and covariance of Single Shot Probability of Kill. Battle Space Analysis is a key component of MD C2BMC. In Phase I we developed a preliminary algorithmic architecture to determine Probabilistic Battle Space, including robust estimates of Pkill. Our algorithmic and software architecture is modular and designed to probabilistically accommodate constraints of various weapon systems. In Phase II we will develop the algorithmic detailed design and prototype software to Technology Readiness Level 5 (or 6). There are uncertainties and ambiguities in the knowledge, information and data used to plan a missile defense engagement, such as the treat state vector. Existing missile defense systems base their engagement decisions primarily on mean parameter values such as threat state vectors, without systematically taking into consideration the associated uncertainties. Decisions that do not consistently handle the stochastic nature of the engagement can be overly optimistic or overly pessimistic in their estimate of probability of kill. Based on significant lessons learned it was found that considering the effect of these uncertainties when planning engagements can significantly enhance the overall effectiveness of a BMD system. While the many-on-many engagement problem is key for real-time Battle Management, the proper formulation and solution of the one-on-one engagement problem is the core building block. Our study focused on the probabilistic formulation and solution of the one-on-one engagement problem, systematically taking into account uncertainties and errors. We are in the process of modeling knowledge representations and developing probabilistic behavior models that realistically represent the ballistic missile battle space for use in high performance and high effectiveness, global maximization of P-kill over all of battle space engagement decision algorithms. The representation of the one-on-one engagement problem is to roll up all uncertainties into Single Shot Probability of Kill (SSPK) with its `mean' and `distribution' in multi-dimensional space, and plan engagements in optimal P-kill `volumes' in this multi-dimensional space. The GMD and KEI POs have endorsed our study, and we intend to develop core and generic capabilities in Probabilistic Battle Space Analysis during the Phase II Basic Contract that can be modified and tailored for GMD and KEI specific issues. We propose an additional Option 1 Contract to address some of the key and generic PBSA issues in Midcourse MD, and an Option 2 Contract to address generic PBSA issues in Boost Phase MD, avoiding specific design issues of GMD and KEI. The Phase II implementation will focus on algorithmic methods that efficiently compute the effects of key MD uncertainties on potential engagements. Our objective is to develop detailed algorithms and tools in a spiral, evolutionary manner for potential insertion into BMDS block upgrades and for use in other domains, focusing on missile/air defense applications in Phase II. We intend to extend our approach to non-DoD government applications and to private sector commercial markets in Phase III.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

21 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2015). Reported award amounts total $6,882,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.