SBIR/STTR Research Award

Dual-Use Simulation Technologies for Advanced Technology Demonstrations in Synthetic Battlespace

Award identifier e5abc99416d302588456dd7784b65039fc66478866a711c0ba14dad5afb2a34fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,968

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Defense Research Associates, Inc.
Proposal award date
2004-03-18
Contract end date
2005-03-01
UEI
L73CMBUJKJT5
Solicitation number
2004.1
Topic code
AF04-232

Research abstract

Current application research demonstration methodologies utilize open-air range testing to conduct advanced technology demonstrations. This approach is time-consuming and requires extensive/costly flight testing. Open-air ranges cannot generate the dense threat environments that would be experienced in actual combat situations. Flight test productivity is low due to the fact that there are so many uncontrolled variables and the inability to make changes during the actual flight test. This research topic focuses on reducing the heavy reliance on open-air range testing for advanced technology demonstrations. Current simulation technologies do not provide the required fidelity and real-time simulation support environment required for synthetic battlespace advanced technology demonstrations. DRA proposes to solve this challenging technology limitation by developing a Battlespace Electronic Attack Simulation Testbed (BEAST) concept for evolving and demonstrating advanced airborne electronic attack technologies. BEAST will utilize a distributed architecture that will support the employment of the DoD High Level Architecture (HLA) concept for conducting collaborative research. The BEAST effort will develop/evolve high fidelity, dual-use, real-time simulation technologies to enable advanced technology demonstrations to be conducted in a laboratory generated synthetic battlespace. BEAST uses constructive (digital models), virtual (man-in-the-loop) and hardware-in-the-loop simulation for synthetic battlespace advanced technology demonstrations and the capability to trace the military worth of research contributions due to insertion of advanced technologies within constructive or virtual simulations. BEAST will provide simulator technology to develop/evolve/demonstrate advanced electronic attack technologies for application to military aircraft such as F-22, B-52, F-35, and the X-45 Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV). During Phase II, DRA will implement a prototype capability into the Sensors Directorate's Integrated Demonstrations and Applications Laboratory (IDAL) and demonstrate key performance characteristics. The Phase II effort will provide a building block capability for rapid evolution and demonstration of advanced airborne electronic attack technology.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

62 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2019). Reported award amounts total $38,652,621. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.