SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improving Validity Measures for Alcohol-Related Models

Award identifier 4c1ab13c274e3edb3e9e9e21822c70403c99f9a6d5252e5069d76092de7432d1Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$0

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
MARTINGALE RESEARCH CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
T9NGMH8MYAR3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Improved goodness-of-fit (GOF) measures that support specification testing for binary logistic, multinomial logistic, and linear regression models would be invaluable to investigators in alcohol-related epidemiological research and the broader clinical trials and health services research communities. Such models are used extensively to identify patterns of alcohol-related symptoms, define criteria of alcohol use disorders, and evaluate policies regulating use and distribution of alcoholic beverages. However, many regression models are inevitably misspecified (i.e., do not contain the true distribution that generated the observed data). This may lead to incorrect inferences when applying standard inferential techniques. In actual practice currently available statistical software uses GOF summary measures and statistical diagnostics that are not specifically designed to detect model misspecification and can be shown to make incorrect statistical inferences in the presence of common sources of model misspecification. Accordingly, researchers have minimal statistical tools to make reliable inferences for readily evaluating if their fitted model is the theoretically correct one. Information matrix (IM) tests are a type of model misspecification test (White, 1982, 1994, 1998) that are specifically intended to solve problems such as those previously mentioned. Phase II research will extend Phase I findings to develop and implement new IM statistical tests for: 1) multinomial logistic regression, and 2) linear regression on independent identically distributed as well as locally correlated observations. The Phase II experimental design will utilize Monte Carlo simulation bootstrapping methods for the purposes of evaluating the new IM tests using representative NIAAA databases. Specifically, the simulation studies will empirically characterize both the appropriateness of the large sample assumptions as well as the specificity and sensitivity (i.e., statistical power) of the new IM tests. These simulation study methodologies in conjunction with the new IM tests will be integrated into a prototype user-friendly standalone software package for the purposes of supporting epidemiological and health related regression modeling. In summary, Phase II research will establish the essential technical foundation for Phase III commercialization with the long-term objective of providing a suite of model specification tests as an advanced statistical tool for regression modeling in order to improve epidemiological and health-related research.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

32 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2019). Reported award amounts total $10,833,491. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.