SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Novel Hybrid Solid Support for Cost-Effective, Large-Scale Oligonucleotide Synt

Award identifier 1b1eaa0fe945bd7d5ebf6d950e389ce22309b8626868c415156dfe4dcfbc7052Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$97,815

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Prime Synthesis
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2009-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): As an increasing number of DNA and RNA-oligonucleotide-based drugs are moving through clinical trials, the pharmaceutical industry is focusing on ways to bring these novel therapeutics to market at a competitive prices. The primary goal of this project is to help reduce the cost of producing oligonucleoside-based drugs, via a novel synthesis solid support. It has been noted by leaders in the industry, that solid support-related costs are a major factor in large-scale oligonucleotide production. (1). Aside from lowering the cost of the solid support itself, one way to gain economy is to increase the oligonucleotide yield per unit volume of solid support - primarily through higher initial nucleoside loadings. Improving the scalability characteristics of the solid support, so that larger batch sizes of oligonucleotides could be produced would also enhance economy. A solid support designed to improve oligonucleotide purity would result in less costly production via less purification costs. At larger pore sizes (gt600 Angstroms), Controlled Porosity Glass (CPG) is often the preferred solid support for large scale syntheses of RNA and longer oligos (2), however it's maximum nucleoside loading capabilities are somewhat limited. Porous polystyrene supports are available in much higher nucleoside loadings; however they cannot be used at these loadings for RNA and longer oligos, due to solvent swelling effects and related pore distortion. They do, however allow the use of certain synthesis reagents that can be corrosive to glass. By combining the large and dimensionally stable pore characteristics of CPG, with the higher loading capacities of polystyrene, a superior hybrid solid support should result. The product of this research will facilitate syntheses of the newer, bulkier therapeutic oligos with higher purities than polystyrene supports, with higher yields than CPG supports, yet will be rigid enough to scale to very large reactors without suffering from the compression and reduced synthesis solution flow characteristics that would limit solvated polymer supports. Preliminary attempts in this laboratory to produce such a hybrid support have been very encouraging. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: As an increasing number of DNA and RNA-oligonucleotide-based drugs are moving through clinical trials, the pharmaceutical industry is focusing on how to bring these novel therapeutics to market at a competitive prices. The purpose of this project is to develop a novel solid support, which will provide a more cost-effective approach to the large-scale syntheses of such oligonucleotides.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.