SBIR/STTR Research Award

The Language Equity and Accessibility Performance (LEAP) Initiative: Addressing disparities through a paradigm shift in language services operations

Award identifier b4a527cb9b2428a25b283b88da0e56d03ed7d1ff15f485144e60ac899a638aa2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$981,286

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Transcendent International, LLC
Proposal award date
2025-07-21
Contract end date
2027-02-28
UEI
V5UPVWD193C7
Solicitation number
PA22-176
Topic code
102

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) continue to experience a range of health disparities compared to English-proficient patients. Addressing persistent gaps in language services requires a paradigm shift in which health systems evaluate and track their compliance with relevant regulations, implement staff training, and carefully craft and communicate exhaustive language access policies to staff. However, most health systems lack the expertise needed to carry out these specific recommendations. Public health and healthcare administration degree programs rarely cover language access in their curricula, and there is no national standardizing body or certification program for language access operations. This project will develop the Language Equity and Accessibility Performance (LEAP) Initiative to help health systems expand and improve their language services operations. The initiative includes three core innovations (1) a Language Accessibility Index (LAI), the first industry-wide benchmark to guide institutional efforts to improve language services and establish operational metrics, (2) an analytics dashboard for informed decision-making, and (3) an executive training and Certification for Language Access Services Professionals (CLASP), the first standardized training for language access professionals to demonstrate the expertise required to implement an effective language access policy at a hospital or health system. We will first carry out semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders to establish the needs and requirements for developing the three innovations. Our instructional design experts will then synthesize recommendations and best practices to design the LAI, dashboard, and interactive learning activities covering the complex facets of language access operations. Our engineering team will build out the technical capabilities needed to deliver the analytics dashboard and the online portion of the training. Finally, we will pilot the initiative in order to demonstrate overall effectiveness of the program for preparing administrators to improve, expand, and measure the impact of language services operations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

52 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $44,664,658. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.