SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Nozzle Materials and Concepts for High Mass Flux Boost Motors

Award identifier ee48769709da36d539a962d689be321eadde8fc93567d3b227c49388c7b08455Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$68,867

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
MATERIALS RESEARCH & DESIGN INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
QU1NM7F1CDV4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Aluminized rocket motors impose a severe environment on nozzle materials, with pressures of 3000 psi and temperatures of 6300¿F. Thermodynamic calculations, supported by experimental data, indicate that only tungsten (W) and tantalum carbide (TaC) canprovide a non-eroding surface. Recent motor firings show that these materials can survive if the nozzle employs a thin liner over a high temperature sup-port. Unfortunately, not all designs are successful and their behavior is not well understood. Forexample, when a successful W nozzle is analyzed with today's tools, the stresses exceed the measured strengths indicating that the nozzle should have failed. Furthermore, if the models are revised to reflect the successful behavior and then applied to asomewhat different W liner design, the models indicate that the new design should survive when, in fact, it failed.These events indicate that the design tools, which were developed to analyze thick throats made primarily with ablative materials, are not directly applicable to non-eroding refractory materials used as thin, thermal stress-resistant liners. Review of theexisting design tools shows that they can be improved in three specific areas: 1) thermal boundary conditions and heat transfer analysis, 2) material models and structural analysis, and 3) failure criteria for brittle/ductile materials.The proposed program will systematically examine and improve the design methods used in present nozzles. The program will focus on the assumptions and tools used for 1) heat transfer analysis, 2) stress analysis, and 3) failure prediction. The improveddesign methodology will be integrated and verified by comparison with data from recent tests. The improved tools will then be exercised to design a TaC nozzle for an aluminized motor. Selected materials will be purchased and provided for characterization.The program will be performed by Materials Research & Design, Inc. (MR&D). Thermal Technologies, Inc. (TTI) will serve as a consultant in aerothermal behavior. The proposed design methods are directly applicable to improved boost motors, which will increase the capability of commercial communication satellites. Additionally, the technology is appropriate for a variety of high temperature structures includinghypersonic airframes, ramjet engines, and divert and altitude control systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

133 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $60,564,982. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.